[ANSYS Meshing] Grid type for DES simulation

krembil · June 18, 2012, 07:41

Hello,

I am trying to simulate DES around a bluff body (box).
I have read that unstructured grid (tetra) is more convenient since clustering is much easier.
Also I am planning on parametrization of the model.
Can tetra grid give approximately same results as hexa grid?

Thank you!

cfd seeker · June 18, 2012, 11:07

A Grid give good results when the flow is aligned parallel to cells which is very easy to implement using hexa, secondly there are more numerical errors associated with tetra than hexa and thirdly hexa give overall small mesh size as compared to hexa using same node distribution. I don't have any experience in DES, I am just commenting based on my experience with tetra and hexa using URANS.

June 18, 2012, 07:41	Grid type for DES simulation	#1
krembil New Member Marijo Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 12 Rep Power: 15	Hello, I am trying to simulate DES around a bluff body (box). I have read that unstructured grid (tetra) is more convenient since clustering is much easier. Also I am planning on parametrization of the model. Can tetra grid give approximately same results as hexa grid? Thank you!

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[CGNS] CGNS converters available	mbeaudoin	OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion	137	December 14, 2018 04:20
boundary conditions for simpleFoam calculation	foam_noob	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	8	July 1, 2015 08:07
Pressure instability with rhoSimpleFoam	daniel_mills	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	44	February 17, 2011 17:08
buoyantSimpleRadiationFoam	msarkar	OpenFOAM	0	February 15, 2010 06:22
LiftDrag tool	nuovodna	OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD	45	September 2, 2009 17:56

June 18, 2012, 11:07		#2
cfd seeker Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 552 Rep Power: 20	A Grid give good results when the flow is aligned parallel to cells which is very easy to implement using hexa, secondly there are more numerical errors associated with tetra than hexa and thirdly hexa give overall small mesh size as compared to hexa using same node distribution. I don't have any experience in DES, I am just commenting based on my experience with tetra and hexa using URANS.