|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
lnk
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
Hi,
Here is my problem. The Y-block doesn't work well. May I ask how to deal with this geometry? Best regards and many thanks, lnk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Christoph
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 177
Rep Power: 6 ![]() |
you have to extend split or to modify your edge params like linked bunching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
lnk
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
lnk
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 118
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Super Moderator
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,083
Blog Entries: 5
Rep Power: 30 ![]() ![]() |
Here are two methods. First method uses files you just posted with extended split and then another blocking without y-block. See the difference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,523
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 29 ![]() ![]() |
I had downloaded this earlier and just came to post my answer. I see that Far already beat me to it with the correct answer.
Actually your first blocking is fine. All I did was update the mesh sizes (Blocking (tab) => Pre-Mesh Params => Update Sizes => Update All) and recomputed the premesh to get this... Wedge_Fine.jpg You could go with the simpler blocking as Far showed, but there are situations where that quarter Ogrid blocking would be better... For instance, if you had an inner baffle that went part way up the side (between the Ogrid and the side block) or if you had a lot of flow gradients in that region which needed increased resolution (independent of the rest of the model)... It it is really one volume with no special mesh focus needed, then just stretching the Ogrid to fit the shape is probably easiest and best. Hexa is very flexible, keep at it and you will do well. Just remember that the blocking topology doesn't need to match the surface topology.
__________________
----------------------------------------- Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)... CFD Online Users Survey |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! | sc298 | OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others | 2 | March 27, 2011 21:11 |
| 3D Hybrid Mesh Errors | DarrenC | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | November 2, 2010 21:02 |
| [ICEM] Creation of hexa dominant mesh and prism layer | gnuboard | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 5 | May 18, 2010 10:27 |
| fluent add additional zones for the mesh file | SSL | FLUENT | 2 | January 26, 2008 11:55 |
| How to do Geometry from 3D mesh in ICEM | San24 | Main CFD Forum | 4 | August 8, 2005 02:49 |