CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Grid refinement for mesh independency study

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By flotus1

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 18, 2012, 12:01
Default Grid refinement for mesh independency study
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5
peterputer is on a distinguished road
Hi,
i generated a mesh with Ansys Meshing tool (Workbench v14). It is a quasi 2D mesh with a sweep of 1 Cell of a rotationally symmetric problem. I used sweep as method and applied some inflations, face and edge sizing, so basically i ve a quasi 2D unstructured mesh with some local refinements.
I would like to do a mesh independency study and want to refine the global mesh by a constant factor.
Is there any way to do that, or do i need to change the sizing of all my applied sizing functions individually.
peterputer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2012, 23:14
Default
  #2
Member
 
Nathan
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 64
Rep Power: 7
natantyt is on a distinguished road
Hi

You can change it by increasing the relevance number in the defaults section, that will increase the density
natantyt is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 21, 2012, 01:46
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,107
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
If you want to know what happens, especially which cell size you get for a mesh independency study, forget about "physical relevance" or whatever global method provided by the ansys mesher.

Since your mesh doesn't seem to be too complex, changing the parameters of the edge sizings seems to be the appropriate method.
Remember to set the behavior of the sizing functions to "hard", otherwise the ansys mesher might just ignore your input if it thinks it can create a "better" mesh with some arbitrary values.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2012, 10:01
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5
peterputer is on a distinguished road
do u set all ur sizing functions to hard?
since i just do it for some i do prioritise since some times i need to ve at least 2 different sizings, eg one for the edge size for a boundary layer and one for the element size of the elements outside the boundary layer.
peterputer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 25, 2012, 10:20
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
flotus1's Avatar
 
Alex
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,107
Rep Power: 19
flotus1 will become famous soon enoughflotus1 will become famous soon enough
If I wanted to plot certain values of the simulation against the cell size to check for mesh independency, I would definitely set the sizing functions to "hard".

If this is too much work because the geometry is slightly complex, I would not use the ansys mesher for mesh generation.
soheil_r7 likes this.
flotus1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2012, 09:39
Default
  #6
New Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 5
peterputer is on a distinguished road
ok thank you
peterputer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding layers goes wrong with SnappyHexMesh Elise OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 1 April 22, 2013 02:32
killed "snappyHexMesh" parkh32 OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 2 April 8, 2012 17:12
snappyHexMesh aborting Tobi OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 November 10, 2010 04:23
Combustion Convergence problems Art Stretton Phoenics 5 April 2, 2002 05:59
Grid refinement with wall functions Mark Render Main CFD Forum 8 May 2, 2000 07:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:17.