|
[Sponsors] |
[GAMBIT] Is GAMBIT really incapable of map meshing a subtracted surface? |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 16, 2012, 08:04 |
Is GAMBIT really incapable of map meshing a subtracted surface?
|
#1 |
Senior Member
|
Hi,
Im trying to map mesh a rectangle surface which has some rectangular holes in it. But I faced some problems doing it. I tried a simpler gemoetry as you can see below: Dimensions for big rectangle is 3*2 and for the small one is 2.6*0.4. As you see GAMBIT couldn't mesh it as map, instead it used submap shceme. the distance between big and small rectangle in the narrow region is 0.2 m and I used interval size of 0.05. by a little knowledge we all know that GAMBIT must divide this narrow part into 4 elements, but as you can see the left part is divided into 5 and the right into 3 elements ! Any comments about this? regards ~ |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[GAMBIT] Surface Meshing Issues in Gambit | Forrest | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 4 | March 27, 2009 14:22 |
Simple Frustrating Meshing Issue in Gambit (w/pics) | Dylan | ANSYS Meshing & Geometry | 6 | March 23, 2009 16:14 |
importing unmeshed surface from gambit to fluent | NISHIKANT TAMRAKAR | FLUENT | 1 | March 7, 2009 14:08 |
Meshing problem in GAMBIT | Vidya Raja | FLUENT | 0 | May 20, 2006 23:31 |
GAMBIT meshing problem | Gauthier Lambert | Main CFD Forum | 1 | August 3, 2000 09:22 |