CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] ~Howdy

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 4, 2012, 10:44
Question ~Howdy
  #1
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
Howdy,
I am new to ICEM CFD so forgive me if this is a relatively basic question. How do you know how many layers you need for a particular boundary layer? Do you use y+ or do you just simply guess and do it by trial and error?

Nick
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2012, 11:48
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
diamondx's Avatar
 
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,291
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 20
diamondx will become famous soon enough
i use y+. there is a y+ calculator in the website:
Here is the link : http://www.cfd-online.com/Tools/yplus.php
__________________
Regards,
New to ICEM CFD, try this document --> http://goo.gl/G2gkE
Ali
diamondx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2012, 10:28
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
Hey diamondx,
Cool, thanks for directing me to the calculator. I am working on hexa-meshing now, and am about to tackle a complex geometry. How would you recommend me to tackle?
Is it possible to work on each part one by one? So for instance isolating each piece, blocking it and meshing it and then putting all the pieces together?
Or is it better simply to make one big block and carve a topology out of that?

Thanx for your reply,
Andris
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 5, 2012, 10:37
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 16
stuart23 will become famous soon enough
Hi Andris,

The benefit of structured mesh is that it is aligned and conformal to the geometry. By splitting your domain into separate pieces and meshing each individually, you will end up with non-conformal interfaces, thus negating the benefit structured mesh. I cannot think of any reason why it may be a better option to do this (though there probably are some).

Blocking is a skill and artform that is built up with practice. If you try the tutorials, and have a look at some of the older threads in this forum, you will see some great examples of how to block geometries, and hopefully find something that is similar to your project. If you still can't figure it out, post it up here and we can help you out.

Stu
__________________
http://bc247.wordpress.com
stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2012, 10:00
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I've just done an unstructured mesh on my model, but I get these low quality elements at the the trailing edge, i adjusted the edge criterion to 0.001 but the problem is still there?I have read other posts about this but I don't quite understand how to get it done.
Many thanks,
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1st.jpg (100.2 KB, 33 views)
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 6, 2012, 20:18
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 16
stuart23 will become famous soon enough
What meshing algorithm did you use? And have you tried smoothing yet?
__________________
http://bc247.wordpress.com
stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 02:25
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I used Octree, then deleted the quads, smoothed the tri with Laplace, and then meshed with Delaunay which i smoothed by freezing the tris without Laplace. For prism settings i used 0.25 ortho, 0.5 fillet, 180 angle, 3 layers, and initial height set to 0 and a height expansion ratio of 1.2.
The geometry is split into 3 parts, inlet, outlet and wall. No matter what way I mesh, whether hexa or unstructured, I get the same problem of low quality elements at this trailing edge.
Thanks for your help
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 02:26
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
After which I smoother everything whilst freezing the prisms and the smoothed the prisms at 0.01. This does not make a difference, the low quality elements continue to stay there.
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 09:24
Default
  #9
Member
 
Yon Han Chong
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 5
yonchong is on a distinguished road
You might want to try adding a finer density to the trailing edge. You can either use the trailing edge curve or create a new one some distance off of the edge.

Then do

Mesh -> Create Mesh Density

Another way is to create a new part and put the trailing edge curve to the part. Then you can change the max size from the Mesh -> Part Mesh Setup.

Also this could be another time saving tip. Rather than creating a volume and shell mesh with the Octree and delete the volueme to have just the shells, try surface mech generation with Patch Independent option. It does exactly the same operation but you don't have to delete the volume mesh manually.
yonchong is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 09:51
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I have tried to putting a mesh density at the trailing edge zone and I still have the same problem, I have attached 2 snapshots, one before prism, and one after the prisms. Also I get a much bigger mesh expansion ratio
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1st.jpg (97.9 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg 2nd.jpg (98.8 KB, 21 views)
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 09:53
Default
  #11
New Member
 
Nick
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4
Nicolastheterminator is on a distinguished road
Here is another cut-plane with the prisms
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2nd.jpg (96.8 KB, 14 views)
Nicolastheterminator is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 10:26
Default
  #12
Member
 
Yon Han Chong
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 77
Rep Power: 5
yonchong is on a distinguished road
Other people might disagree with me but I think that might be as good as you will get with the tet and prism.

If I were you I will try to run that with a CFD code and see what happens.

By the way, is there a particular reason why you want to run with a tet/prism mesh for this configuration as blocking seems to be suitable for this case?
yonchong is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 7, 2012, 15:38
Default
  #13
Super Moderator
 
diamondx's Avatar
 
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,291
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 20
diamondx will become famous soon enough
yonchong is right, sometimes there is nothing more you can do expect hoping that your solver handles that.
about structured mesh, if you don't mind. We can help you get a descent structured mesh if you are not familiar with blocking in ICEM.
__________________
Regards,
New to ICEM CFD, try this document --> http://goo.gl/G2gkE
Ali
diamondx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 8, 2012, 14:13
Default
  #14
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
Andris is on a distinguished road
Hi guys,
Well the reason for unstructured mesh was just to give it a go and see if I can get a good mesh quality.
Thank you for your advice, I tried giving blocking a go and here are my results, I cant seem to get the bifurcation quite right as I dont know which way to move the O-grid.
Many thanks for your help
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1st.jpg (82.1 KB, 18 views)
File Type: jpg 2nd.jpg (92.0 KB, 14 views)
File Type: jpg 3rd.jpg (99.4 KB, 18 views)

Last edited by Andris; September 8, 2012 at 14:42.
Andris is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2012, 00:56
Default Reg. Geometry
  #15
Member
 
Raghav
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: India, Karnataka
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9
raghav is on a distinguished road
hi,
Can u please share the geometry?

Regards,
Raghav
raghav is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2012, 05:11
Default
  #16
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
Andris is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I've zipped the model, the geometry format is in the form of an stl file.
Thanks
Attached Files
File Type: zip Second_3d_model.zip (13.7 KB, 5 views)
Andris is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 13, 2012, 15:05
Default
  #17
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Search CFD online for posts about a "trailing edge surface"...

This is a way to improve quality by letting the prisms run back from the cusp rather than wrapping around it.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2012, 05:36
Default ICEM - Hexa
  #18
Member
 
Raghav
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: India, Karnataka
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 9
raghav is on a distinguished road
Hi,
PFA of the completed hexa mesh for your geometry. Quality is maintained at .32. and 8 elements are placed to capture the boundary layer. Randomly i have taken 8 elements. Hope this helps you
Attached Files
File Type: zip Second_3d_model_Completed.zip (46.6 KB, 8 views)

Last edited by raghav; September 14, 2012 at 05:37. Reason: Missed the attachment
raghav is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2012, 05:56
Default
  #19
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 35
Rep Power: 5
Andris is on a distinguished road
Hi Raghav,
Many thanks for the document, it has helped me understand how to properly block the geometry. It was very kind of you.
Simon, is the idea to create a region at the trailing edge, and exclude it from the prism settings in part mesh setup?
Regards,
Andris
Andris is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 14, 2012, 08:44
Default
  #20
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
No, the idea is to create a trailing edge surface so the prisms can follow it out into the wake rather than try to wrap around the cusp... I give details and pics in other posts.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11.