CFD Online Discussion Forums

CFD Online Discussion Forums (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/)
-   ANSYS Meshing & Geometry (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ansys-meshing/)
-   -   [ICEM] geometry repair (https://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ansys-meshing/108031-geometry-repair.html)

yuhehuan October 12, 2012 13:04

geometry repair
 
1 Attachment(s)
Hi! I have a problem of my geometry. I attached a picture. Have you found some holes of in this surface? Does it affect the mesh quality? How could i deal with it? Thanks!

Far October 12, 2012 14:16

ICEM is very much tolerant of small problems in the geometry. Give it a try and come here back.

yuhehuan October 12, 2012 14:26

But I can't generate prim mesh. And the mesh quality is only 0.4.

diamondx October 12, 2012 15:12

0.4 is ok for fluent !! give it a try...

yuhehuan October 12, 2012 15:24

1 Attachment(s)
But when i import the mesh into fluent, the convergence curve is bad, like this picture.So I think it's the problem of the mesh. I am not sure where the problem it is.

diamondx October 12, 2012 18:47

i think it's more because of your geometry than your mesh.
You outlet is way too close to your inlet... what are you trying to model ??

yuhehuan October 12, 2012 23:48

Oh, maybe. I want to analyse the pressure drop of air flow through the widest path unit (it's made of four grain kernels). So I can't change the model. I am not sure if i use the structed mesh the mesh quality will change. Because I guess the Y-GRID may be better. So do you have some idea how to use structed mesh on my model? Thank you so much!

Far October 13, 2012 03:25

Blocking can be done. You can refer to this thread, where discussion on blocking is under way.

yuhehuan October 13, 2012 17:30

Thank you so much for your help! I will read it then think about how i can do.

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 01:52

1 Attachment(s)
:)Hi, I used Y-grid to my geometry. But there is a problem of my mesh. I am not sure if it is the problem of block or the surface of the geometry. I think there is no problem of my block. Could you check it for me? Many thanks!

Far October 14, 2012 01:53

The only way to learn ICEM is to share the .tin file ;)

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 02:00

1 Attachment(s)
thanks a lot!

Far October 14, 2012 02:11

oh, complex model. Trying my best and will comeup with solution very soon.

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 02:20

:pit is really complex. I have been confused with it for a month. I tried unstructed mesh but the the convergence is not good in fluent. So I am trying to use structed mesh now. Hope you can sovle it. And I will keep trying. Thank you so much for your help!

Far October 14, 2012 02:23

The prisms in boundary layer and tetra in the rest of the domain is good choice for this model. And convergence should be good with refined boundary layer. It is some sort of intake?

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 02:32

Sorry, I just started learning ICEM and don't know how to use different meshes for different areas. This is a model for airflow. The inlet is at the bottom surface. And the outlet is one of the side surfaces of this model. Somebody said that the convergence is bad becuase the inlet is too close with the outlet. I am not sure. I think i can't change the model. So, just improve the mesh quality.

Far October 14, 2012 02:35

You can extend the inlet and outlet domain and apply slip BOCO on them and record the data at the original inlet and outlet planes.

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 02:42

Sorry, i really don't have an idea about your advice. I am a newcomer. I think if the structed mesh can't change the convergence, then I will try another method. So, firsly, try the structed mesh,maybe it will work.:p

Far October 14, 2012 02:44

I am also sending you the link of training material through pm

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 02:49

Thank you so much for your tutorial! You are really so nice!

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 02:56

I also have a question. If I checked the model, for example the surface after import the igs file into ICEM and it is said that one surface is checked to have a problem. What should i do to repair the surface?

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 03:47

1 Attachment(s)
Hi, I solved the problem of the mess mesh. But the mesh quality is still bad. So far, I don't know what the problem it is.

Far October 14, 2012 03:50

attach blocking

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 04:00

attach blocking?

Far October 14, 2012 04:00

Yes. .blk file....

yuhehuan October 14, 2012 04:12

1 Attachment(s)
I am so sorry. It is 3 am in my region. So, just a little tired. I attached a new file now.Thank you!

yuhehuan October 16, 2012 12:49

Hi, Far. I think I found what the problem exsits. I tried to change the outlet to the upper surface to make the inlet not too close to the outlet. And the convergence is better than before. And I guess the uncrtucted mesh I generated is good enough for the fluent calculation. So, as you said, it is not the problem of the tetro mesh, it is the problem of the geometry. But the structed mesh is also bad. But anyway, could you give me a detailed explanation about the idea you said " extend the inlet and outlet domain and apply slip BOCO on them and record the data at the original inlet and outlet planes. " Thank you so so much for your help. I am looking forward to your reply.

Best Wishes!

diamondx October 16, 2012 13:10

keep the inlet and outlet in your geometry, in the meshing tab, declare them as "internal wall". Now, extend your outlet. In fluent, the extended outlet will be the real outlet, and the outlet that you declared internal wall will be interior.
The extension is for a stability in the calculation, you are more intererested in knowing what's going wrong in your outlet (interior one). you kept it interior so you can visualize it easily in the post processing. am i clear enough ??? let me know...

Far October 16, 2012 13:20

Hey Ali
Lets try our skills of hexa meshing on this geometry. What do you say?


@yuhehuan

If you apply the no slip boundary condition on the extended domain then you will have the extra effects of the boundary layer growth and which are not present in the original geometry.

diamondx October 16, 2012 13:28

@far i will , i'm a little bit busy right now... we keep in touch

diamondx October 16, 2012 13:35

could you get a good blocking so far ??

Far October 16, 2012 13:36

Quote:

Originally Posted by diamondx (Post 386929)
could you get a good blocking so far ??

Hopefully, I will get one by tomorrow. Any update on multi-zone?

diamondx October 16, 2012 13:56

it worked for one geometry but not the other. trying to investigate the problem more... i realized that the one in which it didn't work had a bad geometry... I'll try everything once again this week end.

yuhehuan October 16, 2012 23:19

Hi, Ali. I am sorry I didn't completely understand your idea. I tried to extend the outlet surface using "extend surface" command. But I am not sure which sub-command shoud be used. Need I extend both inlet and outlet in ICEM or in FLUENT? Thank you so much!

Regards!

Rong

Quote:

Originally Posted by diamondx (Post 386924)
keep the inlet and outlet in your geometry, in the meshing tab, declare them as "internal wall". Now, extend your outlet. In fluent, the extended outlet will be the real outlet, and the outlet that you declared internal wall will be interior.
The extension is for a stability in the calculation, you are more intererested in knowing what's going wrong in your outlet (interior one). you kept it interior so you can visualize it easily in the post processing. am i clear enough ??? let me know...


yuhehuan October 17, 2012 18:19

1 Attachment(s)
I tried to extend the inlet and outlet of my geometry. But I am not sure it's correct. Is is like this after extended?

diamondx October 17, 2012 21:11

yes that's was i was reffering to, may be more if you can handle large large element. keep your original outlet. declare them as internal wall, and export them as interior...

yuhehuan October 18, 2012 19:01

Hi, Ali. I tried to defined the inlet and outlets as internal walls. But I am not sure how to define. Do I just name it? I divided mesh on the whole geometry after extend the inlet and outlets. The result is as the following picture. Do I just need to divide mesh on the original mesh and split mesh on the internal walls or divide mesh on the geometry including the extension part? Many thanks!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:29.