# [GAMBIT] Rotating Concentric Cylinder with mech density higher at the edges

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

October 25, 2012, 10:57
Rotating Concentric Cylinder with mech density higher at the edges
#1
New Member

rshbhb
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
Dear MAX,

Hello Sir,

I want to make the kind of geometry as shown in the image (attached) in the gambit software. I believe that you can help me.

Thank you.
Attached Images
 gambit geo.jpg (98.1 KB, 43 views)

 October 25, 2012, 12:25 #2 Senior Member     Daniele Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Italy Posts: 993 Rep Power: 17 Hi, 1-create the external cylinder (centered in 0,0,0) 2-create the internal cylinder (centered in 0,0,0) 3-subtract the internal cylinder from the external one 4-create the plane y=0 5-split the volume with this plane 6-mesh edges of the lower base of your volume and mesh the two faces with quad map scheme (if you cannot mesh with map scheme change the vertex type to end) 7-mesh the generatrix of the cylinder 8-mesh the volume with hex cooper scheme, choosing as faces bottom and top faces Daniele

 October 25, 2012, 12:56 #3 New Member   rshbhb Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 Thank you Daniele. I'll try and inform you.

October 26, 2012, 02:52
#4
Senior Member

Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 17
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rshbhb Thank you Daniele. I'll try and inform you.
I tried the steps above, the cells of the 2 volumes if meshed with the cooper scheme will be slightly distorted;
so:

1-create the external cylinder (z positive)
2-create the internal cylinder (z positive)
3-subtract the internal cylinder from the external one
4-create the plane y=0 (for example a big square in xz)
5-split the volume with this plane
6-mesh edges of the bases of your 2 volumes and mesh the 4 faces with quad map scheme
7-mesh the generatrix of the cylinder
8-mesh the 2 volumes with hex map scheme

Daniele

Last edited by ghost82; October 26, 2012 at 03:12.

 October 26, 2012, 06:10 #5 New Member   rshbhb Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 I tried this too. but the problem I am facing is, I cannot join back the two volumes after meshing. I tried to merge the two volumes but the two faces (inside the volume of the annulus) still remain . How do I remove them? If there is any other alternative (like, to give the BC for the interior faces as INTERIOR) then please let me know. Thank you, Daniele.

October 26, 2012, 06:15
#6
Senior Member

Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 17
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rshbhb I tried this too. but the problem I am facing is, I cannot join back the two volumes after meshing. I tried to merge the two volumes but the two faces (inside the volume of the annulus) still remain . How do I remove them? If there is any other alternative (like, to give the BC for the interior faces as INTERIOR) then please let me know. Thank you, Daniele.
Why do you want to merge the volumes?
Internal faces are not treated as walls, and the two volumes are connected as they are a single volume!
Make sure you check "connected" when you split the volume!

Last edited by ghost82; October 26, 2012 at 06:53.

 October 26, 2012, 06:26 #7 New Member   rshbhb Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 Thanks again. I thought that internal faces will be counted as walls. I want to Give boundary conditions as: Upper faces-2faces as walls (stationary) Lower faces-2 faces as walls (stationary) Interior faces (rotating) exterior faces (stationary) & the interors volumes as FLuid (liquids) (Basically I am trying to make a rheometer geometry) Should I define the internal & external faces as walls too,, in GAMBIT ?

October 26, 2012, 07:00
#8
Senior Member

Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 17
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rshbhb Should I define the internal & external faces as walls too,, in GAMBIT?
Yes, you have to define them as walls

 October 26, 2012, 07:12 #9 New Member   rshbhb Join Date: Oct 2012 Posts: 26 Rep Power: 6 Will I have to select any kind of dynamic or sliding mesh OR I can do normal meshing and rotate the inner walls in FLUENT solver ? (I use the 2nd option). -Awaiting a quick reply. THanks

October 26, 2012, 07:16
#10
Senior Member

Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 17
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rshbhb Will I have to select any kind of dynamic or sliding mesh OR I can do normal meshing and rotate the inner walls in FLUENT solver ? (I use the 2nd option) -Awaiting a quick reply. THanks

I think you can only set in fluent the inner wall as "moving"->rotational in respect to z axis as in the tutorial "Non-Newtonian Transitional Flow in an Eccentric Annulus" (search google); However, you should better open a new thread in the fluent forum to have other opinions.

Daniele

October 26, 2012, 07:20
#11
New Member

rshbhb
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghost82 I think you can only set in fluent the inner wall as "moving"->rotational in respect to z axis as in the tutorial "Non-Newtonian Transitional Flow in an Eccentric Annulus" (search google); However, you should better open a new thread in the fluent forum to have other opinions. Daniele
I'll open a new thread in the FLUENT forum. But as you are aware of the problem description can you help me out with FLuent simulation too ?

October 26, 2012, 07:25
#12
Senior Member

Daniele
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Italy
Posts: 993
Rep Power: 17
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rshbhb I'll open a new thread in the FLUENT forum. But as you are aware of the problem description can you help me out with FLuent simulation too ?

First try to solve the problem on your own, you will learn lots of things from your mistakes; however if you will get stuck at some point me and other people will help you.

Daniele

October 26, 2012, 07:34
#13
New Member

rshbhb
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by ghost82 First try to solve the problem on your own, you will learn lots of things from your mistakes; however if you will get stuck at some point me and other people will help you. Daniele
Dear Sir/ Ma'am,

I have tried to solve the problem with simple mesh geometry but the results obtained by them are a bit absurd.

THank you !

October 26, 2012, 07:53
#14
New Member

rshbhb
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by rshbhb I'll open a new thread in the FLUENT forum. But as you are aware of the problem description can you help me out with FLuent simulation too ?

Kind Regards,
Rishabh

FLuent simulation of taylor couette flow of concentric cylinder geometry.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post vishwa OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 24 June 27, 2016 08:54 HiF OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 July 17, 2010 00:06 Tim Daly FLUENT 1 November 10, 2008 00:02 brian FLUENT 6 September 11, 2006 08:23 AB CD-adapco 6 November 15, 2004 05:41

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:45.