CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Cleaning Rippled Surfaces in ICEM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 7, 2012, 18:08
Default Cleaning Rippled Surfaces in ICEM
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
scribby182 is on a distinguished road

Thank you for any help you can give.

I have geometry from a parasolid file. I imported it through Workbench and then exported to an ICEM project. Most of the geometry looks good, but when I zoom in on a few of the surface intersections I see facets in the surface (see attached image). Surfaces are being displayed fully (not simple), so I don't think that is it. I can try to rebuild the surfaces from the surrounding curves and that sometimes helps, but sometimes ICEM is unable to rebuild the surfaces at all.

Any suggestions on how to correct these issues (or opinions on whether or not they're going to make a big difference in the mesh)? I'm an intermediate ICEM user and have a pretty good feel for the program, but I don't think I'm using the geometry repairing tools to their fullest. My experience, however, is that whenever you THINK there is a problem with the geometry, if you don't correct it immediately it ends up causing big headaches later.

Thanks again for all your help. Sorry, but I will not be able to post the geometry, blocking, etc. for this as it is a sensitive part.

scribby182 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2012, 13:30
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 182
Rep Power: 9
energy382 is on a distinguished road
have you set up facet quality to value 10 in desgin modeler before you export the geometry?

what i would do:
1. import parasolid to DM
2. set up facet quality to 10
3. export as .agdb-file
4. import in icem as workbenchreader file

that should normally work

have you tried to import parasolid directly to icem?
energy382 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 10, 2012, 16:58
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
scribby182 is on a distinguished road
energy, thanks for your response. Along with this surface problem, I'm having a few others that prevent me from trying what you ask...

For some reason, DM itself wont generate my parasolid files. If I make a mesh module in workbench and then just right click and import geometry on the main workbench page, I can import my parasolid. Opening mesh then shows the correct geometry (where I usually then export for ICEM). If I double click on DM, however, and then try to generate the geometry in DM I get the error "All bodies could not be imported because they contain corrupt data structures". I haven't figured the cause of this yet (its especially strange since the geometry is still available in mesh...). Because I can't get the goemetry in DM, I can't try to facet quality fix.

I have also tried importing parasolid directly to ICEM, but when I use that method the parasolid surfaces extend past the curves that were used to cut them (so imagine you had a rectangular surface and cut it in ProE or something to make your parasolid... if I import straight into ICEM then I see the full rectangle (before cut) PLUS the cut in the surface).

If anyone has other suggestions (or fixes to the extra problems) I'd appreciate it. Thanks,

scribby182 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2012, 17:34
New Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 5
scribby182 is on a distinguished road
In playing with the model and some settings, I found I could improve (but not completely fix) the visuals I was getting by decreasing the triangulation tolerance. If I drop it by 1-2 orders of magnitude it significantly reduces the ripples, but a few still remain.

I have a few follow-up questions about this hopefully someone can answer. I'm just not quite sure how the triangulation tolerance (and similar settings) affect meshing results.

1) If I was to fully mesh this part (including the remaining ripples), would the mesh itself be rippled like the geometry or would the mesh be ok?
2) If I used something like "project to Bsplines", would that correct the problem for the mesh (it doesn't make the geometry surface look any different)?
3) The downside to reducing the triangulation tolerance is the slower panning/rotating/zooming. Is there any reason I shouldn't leave the triangulation tolerance high (ie ~0.01) while I'm manipulating the geometry, but when I get to really detailed meshing (getting everything looking perfect) I then turn the triangulation tolerance down (~0.0001)?

Thanks again for the help,

scribby182 is offline   Reply With Quote


icem 3d

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Difficulty creating surfaces in ICEM johnp ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 7 May 14, 2013 04:22
[ICEM] Meshing adjacent wall geometry and simple ICEM questions everdimension ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 25 June 20, 2012 04:25
Periodic cut surfaces - ICEM? Jane CFX 0 May 18, 2008 20:55
Faceted surfaces in ICEM Chriss Main CFD Forum 1 May 6, 2008 15:18
Surfaces lost from ICEM to CFX-Pre 5.7 Mark CFX 6 September 30, 2004 23:07

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 22:09.