CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] problem with meshing in icem cfd

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 1, 2013, 00:14
Default problem with meshing in icem cfd
  #1
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
dear friends
regards
i am meshing a gas turbine combustor using icem cfd. my geometry has a outer and inner surface and volume between the two.my problem is that when i am meshing the geometry , only the outer surfaces and the volume is getting meshed. the inner surfaces which have a very important role to play in the combustor are not getting recognised. as a result my simulation is not giving the results as on expected lines. Dear friends what could be the reason. i am using patch independent method for surface meshing and octree method for volume meshing. plz help . i am chennai based and my no is 9790702545
regards
saurabh joshi
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2013, 05:29
Default
  #2
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,914
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Pics would certainly help to understand problem. Are these zero thickness surfaces?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2013, 06:31
Default reply
  #3
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
dear FAR
yes they have zero thickness.the inner as well as outer surfaces all have zero thickness.the inner surfaces have holes by design. the outer surface is a closed one. the holes created in the geometry are for metering purpose. for metering of the fluid. do i close these inner holes and make a separate part for them and then give them as some boundary condition(velocity etc). what could be the problem.if you can mail me your address i can send some pics
thanks
saurabh joshi
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2013, 06:50
Default
  #4
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,914
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
You need to turn on the int wall in part mesh setup, after that ICEM will recogise them as internal wall. My email address can be found on left side of this post
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2013, 09:37
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
diamondx's Avatar
 
Ghazlani M. Ali
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,291
Blog Entries: 23
Rep Power: 20
diamondx will become famous soon enough
someone correct me if i'm wrong, but if you have an inner and an outer surface, and if you don't mesh the inside so you declare later on fluent that it's a coupled wall with a thickness. then you need to only have on mid-surface between the two
__________________
Regards,
New to ICEM CFD, try this document --> http://goo.gl/G2gkE
Ali
diamondx is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2013, 00:01
Default
  #6
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
dear FAR
thanks
i think it should work ( the thanks is in anticipation)
let the lab open today and let me try
thanks again
saurabh joshi
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2013, 00:26
Default
  #7
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,914
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by diamondx View Post
someone correct me if i'm wrong, but if you have an inner and an outer surface, and if you don't mesh the inside so you declare later on fluent that it's a coupled wall with a thickness. then you need to only have on mid-surface between the two
You mean internal wall?
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2013, 01:48
Default inner surfaces recognised... thanks
  #8
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
Dear FAR
thanks for the correct advise , the inner surfaces have been recognised.
howeever, when the mesh is being imported to FLUENT 14, it is creating shadow of all the inner surfaces.
when i am dispalying the inner surface mesh , only one mesh gets displayed for the shadow and the component;however this shadow is coming in the boundary condition drop down list
what could be the problem
is the shadow ok
plz guide
saurabh joshi
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2013, 02:24
Default
  #9
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,914
Blog Entries: 6
Rep Power: 38
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Yes it is ok.
Far is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 4, 2013, 03:21
Default
  #10
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
dear FAR
thanks
so i will now run my simulation.
lets hope these shadows which are created will not create problem
saurabh joshi
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 11, 2013, 01:08
Default a query regarding setting up the Boundary conditions
  #11
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
dear friend
my computation involves high pressure air at the inlet. i know the velocity, temperature, pressure, mass flow rate of the air at the inlet. at the outlet i need to compute these things(specially the pressure)
now the problem what i am facing is
when i select velocity inlet and outflow as my boundary condition for inlet and exit, during hybrid initialization fluent does not knows the pressure at the BC and my pressure results come unrealisitc
when i select pressure inlet and outflow, they are incompatible.
my flow speed is 130 m/s, and the inlet static pressure is 810600 pascal and the inlet temperature is 572 k.
i am setting this pressure(810600) as the the pressure in the velocity inlet bc. why is the system does not recognising this pressure during hybrid initialization.
choosing pressure inlet and pressure outlet bc for inlet and exit must be wrong as i dont know the oulet pressure.
ideally the pressure should not drop. but it is the pressure drop which is significant in our case, which needs to be calculated.
what is going wrong with my setting up of BC's
regards
Saurabh
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 12, 2013, 07:39
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 16
stuart23 will become famous soon enough
You need to specify some sort of outlet BC. Try mass-flow if you are unsure of the pressure.

Stu
__________________
http://bc247.wordpress.com
stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 12, 2013, 12:14
Default
  #13
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
Dear Mr Stuart
So are you suggesting mass flow inlet as the inlet BC and may be outflow as exit BC?
actually setting up pressure inlet and pressure outlet is causing problem.
actually for my problem i am interested in knowing the pressure drop.
so for this the system must calculate the pressure at the exit
and in pressure BC i am setting up the outlet pressure which is wrong as per physics.(as i dont know the outlet condition)
what should i do
velocity inlet and outflow has the problem that during initialisation fluent does not knows pressure at BC.
so plz guide
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   March 12, 2013, 12:27
Default
  #14
New Member
 
saurabh joshi
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 4
saurabhjoshi2011 is on a distinguished road
dear friends
if the surface integral of mass flow at a certain surface comes +ve than it means mass is flowing in, if it comes negative does it means mass is flowing out.
if i know only inlet conditions(static pressure,tempertaure,axialvelocity) and outlet conditions of the system are unknown i.e to be calculated what could be chosen as BC
inlet------------------------------------outlet
velocity------------------ outflow
massflow inlet-------------outflow
plz guide
saurabhjoshi2011 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
gas turbine combustor, meshing 3d

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] T Junction Meshing using ICEM CFD selvam2487 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 17 February 24, 2013 22:09
Problem with reading .cas and .msh file in ICEM CFD kbodla ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 3 March 14, 2011 16:50
ICEM CFD Meshing Problems: Hexa Dominant Evan CFX 6 July 3, 2006 12:37
ICEM meshing problem Forrest CFX 4 May 25, 2005 18:37


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01.