# [ICEM] Export mesh statistics for use in Richardson Extrapolation for grid sensitivity study

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 16, 2013, 06:33 Export mesh statistics for use in Richardson Extrapolation for grid sensitivity study #1 Senior Member     Mr CFD Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Britain Posts: 293 Rep Power: 6 Hi, Following the post from another user in this thread (Grid sensitivity analysis) I want to do a grid sensitivity study using the Richardson extrapolation method. The first step is to define a representative cell, mesh or grid size, . For three-dimensional simulations where is the volume of the cell, is the total number of cells used for the computations. My problem is I don't know how to extract the values of from ICEM as ideally I'd like to do the Richardson Extrapolation method in Excel, where I can compare different meshes. In ICEM how do I export mesh statistics such as volume of each cell? Can it be exported as a handy .csv file? I refer you to the paper I am using: http://journaltool.asme.org/Template...umAccuracy.pdf Thank you

 April 16, 2013, 06:48 #2 Senior Member     Philipp Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 1,138 Rep Power: 16 Since you just need the ratio of h(fine)/h(coarse) calculation of an actual value of "h" is not necessary. How do you want to do the refinement in ICEM? __________________ The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.

April 16, 2013, 07:01
#3
Senior Member

Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz Since you just need the ratio of h(fine)/h(coarse) calculation of an actual value of "h" is not necessary. How do you want to do the refinement in ICEM?
My variable of interest is wall heat transfer coefficient at the various boundaries. I am using the SST turbulence model. For accurate heat transfer predictions I need a Y+ < 1. So far the maximum Y+ I have on any of my boundaries is 1.6.

I will do the refinement in ICEM by applying more nodes in the thermal boundary layer.

 April 16, 2013, 07:03 #4 Senior Member     Philipp Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 1,138 Rep Power: 16 Do you use blocking / hexa meshing or unstructured? __________________ The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.

April 16, 2013, 07:11
#5
Senior Member

Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz Do you use blocking / hexa meshing or unstructured?
I use blocking (hexa mesh). Before I export the mesh in .cfx5 format I right click on "Pre-Mesh" and click on "Convert to Unstructured Mesh".

 April 16, 2013, 07:13 #6 Senior Member     Philipp Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 1,138 Rep Power: 16 Great. Then you have all the numbers... Do you refine the whole grid by using the mesh->refine utility, or do you change the number of nodes of some relevant edges? Is this 2d? Can you post some picture? __________________ The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.

April 16, 2013, 07:24
#7
Senior Member

Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz Great. Then you have all the numbers... Do you refine the whole grid by using the mesh->refine utility, or do you change the number of nodes of some relevant edges? Is this 2d? Can you post some picture?
It is 2D axisymmetric. I change the number of nodes of relevant edges. The geometry is shown below:

Do you want a picture of the mesh?

 April 16, 2013, 07:31 #8 Senior Member     Philipp Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 1,138 Rep Power: 16 How large is your coarsest mesh? In 2d (and such a simple geometry) it is often affordable to just refine the whole mesh, which means you will end up with a 4 times larger mesh (2 x in "x" and 2 x in "y" direction). Would that be ok for you? __________________ The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.

April 16, 2013, 07:48
#9
Senior Member

Mr CFD
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Britain
Posts: 293
Rep Power: 6
Quote:
 Originally Posted by RodriguezFatz How large is your coarsest mesh? In 2d (and such a simple geometry) it is often affordable to just refine the whole mesh, which means you will end up with a 4 times larger mesh (2 x in "x" and 2 x in "y" direction). Would that be ok for you?
The coarsest mesh has 6500 elements and 3072 nodes. I do have the computational resources to double, triple and quadruple the number of elements and nodes.

However what I am interested in is the Richardson extrapolation method I mentioned in my original post.

 April 16, 2013, 08:05 #10 Senior Member     Philipp Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 1,138 Rep Power: 16 It's always the same method: In your case, save your coarse mesh. Then refine the (unstructured) mesh, by clicking on "Edit Mesh -> Adjust Mesh Density". Here you can use "Refine All Mesh", method "pure refinement", steps "1". ->apply. You will get a mesh, that is 2 times finer in each dimension. Save that mesh. Do the same refinement again and you will end up with a even finer mesh. Now run your simulation on all three meshes. Use the coarse results as interpolation for initializing the other runs. For each simulation you need one single "important" value, such as you heat transfer coefficient or whatever. Using the nomenclature of your pdf, these values are the phi 3, 2 an 1. Since you doubled the number of points in each dimension the value of r21 and r32 is "2". Here we go! RicochetJ likes this. __________________ The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.

 April 16, 2013, 08:45 #11 Senior Member     Mr CFD Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Britain Posts: 293 Rep Power: 6 Thank you! That actually does help.

 April 16, 2013, 09:34 #12 Senior Member     Philipp Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Germany Posts: 1,138 Rep Power: 16 If you did that, you could post the values here for others to see how it works... __________________ The skeleton ran out of shampoo in the shower.

 January 18, 2014, 19:57 #13 Member   don lenardo Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 75 Rep Power: 6 Hello, I have one additional question regarding the Richardson Interpolation: What is about r21 and r32 if only the total number of cells is doubled (by splitting one direction)? Example: Coarse: 3 Million cells Reference: 6 Million cells Fine: 12 Million cells I then r21=r32=1.25?? Thanks in advance. //Markus

 Tags cfx, grid sensitivity, icem, richardson extrapolation

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Yogendra Shastri Main CFD Forum 0 February 22, 2008 14:14 SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55 Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10 hung FLUENT 7 April 18, 2005 09:38 Althea FLUENT 21 February 6, 2001 08:05

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:31.