CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Wing Woes. Difficult geometry,(or inept user) Swept and tapered 3d wing

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree3Likes

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   Yesterday, 02:21
Default
  #21
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
I already did an o-grid around this wing (like in the vid)? Plus I have deleted the blocks inside the wing.
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 02:24
Default
  #22
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,065
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 30
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
When you select the blocks inside the wind for o-grid generation, do not select any face.
__________________
Best Regards
Far

http://cfd-consultancy.webs.com/
Far is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 02:35
Default
  #23
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
I will give that a go, but I am still trying to figure out why I got those weird results I mention earlier.

There is nothing i this area so i figure it has to be an artifact of the mesh. And its in one of the big blocks in the farfield, I would have been less surprised if it had happened where there was heaps of blocks (inline with the wing but towards the wall opposite the one the wing is attatched too)

So yeah, im real confused.
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 02:48
Default
  #24
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,065
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 30
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShowponyStuart View Post
I will give that a go, but I am still trying to figure out why I got those weird results I mention earlier.

There is nothing i this area so i figure it has to be an artifact of the mesh. And its in one of the big blocks in the farfield, I would have been less surprised if it had happened where there was heaps of blocks (inline with the wing but towards the wall opposite the one the wing is attatched too)

So yeah, im real confused.
Observing flow field without number (cl, cd or whatever variable) will confuse you. Before getting a decent simulation (acceptable mesh, acceptable parameters and convergence) observing merely flow field will mislead you.

At the moment you task should be to get a good mesh. Even after getting numbers I do not look on flow field unless necessary to find reason for some change in data set.
__________________
Best Regards
Far

http://cfd-consultancy.webs.com/
Far is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 02:53
Default
  #25
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
I did monitor my cl and cd and while they were roughly in the region I expected them they were not converging as nicely (werent particularly stable)

But the reason I pointed that out, is that there is something wrong with my mesh in the region I thought was good quality. Its almost like there is some solid object or something in that region (looking at streamlines shows them moving around "something"). So im not sure if there are some solid elements that I generated in my mesh by accident or something

So I agree with you completely, Im just trying to figure out why the mesh quality is poor in those areas.
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 02:59
Default
  #26
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,065
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 30
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
wrong mesh in one area may give you problem area in other region as numerical error is accumulating (numerical diffusion etc) due to wrong calculation of flux, thats why I saying do not monitor flow field at the moment. It does not mean you never look on flow field .

Once your mesh is good, most of the problems will go away, believe me . Just put hard work on mesh, as it is the first step to successful simulation.
__________________
Best Regards
Far

http://cfd-consultancy.webs.com/
Far is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 05:15
Default
  #27
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
Again I cant fault your logic, and I agree with you completely. I just get a bit flighty sometimes when things arent going right, even if I know im doing the right thing haha.

I think Ive made a small breakthrough with the blocking (given your pointer before.) With any luck I will be back with good news soon.
Far likes this.
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 08:13
Default
  #28
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,065
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 30
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShowponyStuart View Post
Again I cant fault your logic, and I agree with you completely. I just get a bit flighty sometimes when things arent going right, even if I know im doing the right thing haha.

I think Ive made a small breakthrough with the blocking (given your pointer before.) With any luck I will be back with good news soon.
After several years in CFD field (that does not make me expert to give advises but I still do ) once your mesh is getting right, your simulation work will make progress at very high pace. During meshing time is flying and one is not making any progress (apparently). Another advantage is that, this experience will help you in next projects, so keep it up and I hope you will get things done.

In meshing (specially blocking) the approach should always be to : one step back and two steps forward instead One step forward, two steps back. (I am in no way a philosopher ). So abandon old blocking and start from scratch and start to build up things and avoid previous mistakes. Also keep in mind the blocking I have attached (DWP2 made by Simon)
ShowponyStuart likes this.
__________________
Best Regards
Far

http://cfd-consultancy.webs.com/
Far is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 08:51
Default
  #29
Far
Super Moderator
 
Far's Avatar
 
Sijal Ahmed Memon (turboenginner@gmail.com)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Islamabad Pakistan
Posts: 3,065
Blog Entries: 4
Rep Power: 30
Far will become famous soon enoughFar will become famous soon enough
Send a message via Skype™ to Far
Just take a look at following threads. It took him around two months or so to get good blocking and mesh (even more as his case very highly complicated but he done it). Really impressive work.

Problems with meshing a 3D wing w/winglet

Problems with meshing a 3D wing w/winglet
__________________
Best Regards
Far

http://cfd-consultancy.webs.com/
Far is online now   Reply With Quote

Old   Yesterday, 22:01
Default
  #30
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
Havent had a chance to read through those links yet (will do that now) but this is my latest attempt. I think that while the blocking is getting closer to what it should be, there are still a lot of problems.



My latest files too.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kyykrrqayg...4AOA_mach4.zip
Far likes this.
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   Today, 06:28
Default
  #31
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
Arghhh...Im about ready to give up.

It was all going good...Reasonably nice mesh you say?


..hey that blocking looks reasonably tidy, you might get a mesh with reasonable quality...



Well if you thought that you would be wrong (as was I).


Just thought I was starting to wrap my head around it a bit, but apparently not.
Im going to have to call it quits soon. I could be working on this until after the project is due for all I know. Unless I am hit with some epiphany, or some assurance I can reliably build the mesh quickly by the end of the week, I dont want to waste any more time chasing my tail.

My last set of files for anyone interested
https://www.dropbox.com/s/28fmx3oyyq...OA_mach5_2.zip
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   Today, 07:53
Default
  #32
Member
 
Stuart
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 54
Rep Power: 2
ShowponyStuart is on a distinguished road
Is it possible that it is some sort of connectivity issue or something? Or possible due to the way I created the O-grid. (Just selected the wing block and no faces like far suggested.) Perhaps I needed to select the face where the wing connects to the wall?
ShowponyStuart is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
3d aerofoil, aerofoil, airfoil, airfoil 3d, wing

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:13.