|
[Sponsors] |
[GAMBIT] Curved Tube Using a Two Phase Approach |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
August 21, 2014, 10:06 |
|
#21 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
This pic explains my inquiry
Is there any need to delete the yellow path line after getting the Geometry ?? |
|
August 22, 2014, 00:36 |
|
#22 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
you can delete it
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 04:54 |
|
#23 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
Oky Max I really appreciate your effort
Take a look at the last work of mine. After deleting the path line was Oky Now the last issue is how to mesh it I did meshing to the volume directly and selected Hex(elements) with Map(type) but I need to achieve the following 48X48X200 as a X*Y*Z |
|
August 22, 2014, 05:04 |
|
#24 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
if you need to mesh also the inner part of your domain, you won't be able to mesh it with quad (I already mentionned it at the beginning of your thread).
For your request 48x48x200. mesh the section (2d) first with desired mesh density and finally mesh the volume by giving the density along one curved edge (200 nodes for instance)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 05:19 |
|
#25 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
Yes I remembered your point.
Let discuss this ... in my picture I think the inner wall is meshed as presented in the pic but after doing mesh check I got that message as mentioned in the black line with the picture which is : 0 out of 1 meshed volume failed mesh check for inverted elements !!! |
|
August 22, 2014, 05:23 |
|
#26 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
try to split your geometry symetrically along (yz), and remesh just one half.
Check if this problem remains
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 05:50 |
|
#27 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
After splitting my geometry by a plane (YZ)
To mesh it I got a Prompt then my Gambit and later the program does not continue |
|
August 22, 2014, 06:10 |
|
#28 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
split along (xz) befor splitting along (yz)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 06:19 |
|
#29 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
Still the same !!!!
|
|
August 22, 2014, 06:28 |
|
#30 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 06:34 |
|
#31 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
I did and this the step before delete the another half
|
|
August 22, 2014, 06:38 |
|
#32 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
upload your dbs on a share server, I will look at it
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 07:00 |
|
#33 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
||
August 22, 2014, 07:13 |
|
#34 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
no problem from my side to mesh it on the fly
Untitled.jpg *mesh Face.4 with size 1 *mesh volume.1 with size 1 >> worst element 0.2
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 09:30 |
|
#35 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
Same procedure of your
the summarizing gave this 0 out of 1 meshed volume failed mesh check for skewed elements > 0.97 0 out of 1 meshed volume failed mesh check for inverted elements |
|
August 22, 2014, 09:35 |
|
#36 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
check skewness of surface mesh (2d)
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
August 22, 2014, 09:55 |
|
#37 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
3D
Total elements = 69300 Active elements = 69300 100% lower = 0 upper = 1 Worst element 0.199768 2D Worst element 0.199768 |
|
August 22, 2014, 10:00 |
|
#38 | |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
Quote:
If you get this, than volume meshing is successful
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
||
August 22, 2014, 10:05 |
|
#39 |
Member
CR-7
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 66
Rep Power: 14 |
Thanks mate
I meshed the volume directly without meshing the face 4 as you did got 0.202 the worst element only is it correct ? Cheers |
|
August 22, 2014, 10:06 |
|
#40 |
Super Moderator
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 3,297
Rep Power: 41 |
I understand right now what you did....
You used the Check Volume Meshes, which gives you " 0 out of 1 meshed volume failed mesh check for ...", which means that no volume has failed the check mesh. Then all volumes have successful check mesh
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
HLL Riemann Shock Tube Matlab Problem | Luke F | Main CFD Forum | 2 | May 20, 2016 02:10 |
alphaEqn.H in twoPhaseEulerFoam | cheng1988sjtu | OpenFOAM Bugs | 15 | May 1, 2016 16:12 |
What is best mesh for cylinder tube? | olivia | FLUENT | 7 | January 16, 2014 05:55 |
How can I model nanofluids with single and 2 phase approach ? | safikhani_hamed | CFX | 3 | August 3, 2011 06:35 |
Statistical Approach for Lagrangian Two Phase Model | Hesham El-Batsh | Main CFD Forum | 0 | November 20, 1998 09:20 |