[ICEM] Difference in ICEM 15.0 and 16.2

sidharath · July 1, 2016, 07:00

Hi all,

I've come across a rather unusual problem.
I was using ICEM 15.0 and due to some issues with my machine, I used one of my colleagues machine who is using ICEM 16.2.
The cell count in the model generated by 15.0 is around 10 million and with exact same settings and sizes, the cell count in 16.2 is around 2 million.

I was wondering if anyone else have encountered similar issue in using ICEM and what could be the possible cause of this?
Is there anything i might be doing utterly wrong?

Thank you

Far · July 1, 2016, 20:53

may be they have changed some internal working.

sidharath · July 4, 2016, 07:10

The difference is too big, have you come across any such incidence while using iCEM 16.2 ?
Thank you

July 1, 2016, 07:00	Difference in ICEM 15.0 and 16.2	#1
sidharath Member Sidharath Join Date: May 2015 Location: UK Posts: 65 Rep Power: 10	Hi all, I've come across a rather unusual problem. I was using ICEM 15.0 and due to some issues with my machine, I used one of my colleagues machine who is using ICEM 16.2. The cell count in the model generated by 15.0 is around 10 million and with exact same settings and sizes, the cell count in 16.2 is around 2 million. I was wondering if anyone else have encountered similar issue in using ICEM and what could be the possible cause of this? Is there anything i might be doing utterly wrong? Thank you

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
[ICEM] How to start ICEM CFD?	Kopzr	ANSYS Meshing & Geometry	13	July 8, 2016 10:33
Workbench 16.2 Start issue	mohamedabolezz	Main CFD Forum	0	June 8, 2016 18:43
Mechanical APDL 16.2 Launch Fatal Error	Maciejz4	ANSYS	2	May 28, 2016 12:13
Can you help me with a problem in ansys static structural solver?	sourabh.porwal	Structural Mechanics	0	March 27, 2016 17:07
Problem with an old Simulation	FrankW	CFX	3	February 8, 2016 04:28

July 1, 2016, 20:53		#2
Far Super Moderator Sijal Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Islamabad Posts: 4,553 Blog Entries: 6 Rep Power: 54	may be they have changed some internal working.

July 4, 2016, 07:10		#3
sidharath Member Sidharath Join Date: May 2015 Location: UK Posts: 65 Rep Power: 10	The difference is too big, have you come across any such incidence while using iCEM 16.2 ? Thank you