CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ANSYS Meshing] Interlocking two body named selection

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   July 19, 2016, 01:02
Default Interlocking two body named selection
  #1
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am taken a error : The mesh file exporter does not support overlapping geometry in named selection

You think a sperical body and the other body is 20 microns thikness out of external radius of sperical body. All faces seperately chosen named selection but error above I have defined is available.

Is it relevant to 20 microns thickness body? Is it not necessary to define named selection?

Kind Regards,
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2016, 01:18
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 14
Kapi is on a distinguished road
view your geometry in wireframe
click each named selection and it shud highlight the face/edge/body
check which two named selection has same face/edge and remove from one.

Yes 20 micron thickness ins possible!
Kapi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2016, 05:33
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapi View Post
view your geometry in wireframe
click each named selection and it shud highlight the face/edge/body
check which two named selection has same face/edge and remove from one.

Yes 20 micron thickness ins possible!
Let me put it this way,

First image attached, it is fluid and 20 micron thickness, all faces( inside and outside have been defined interface)

Secon image attached, it enters in 20 micron thickness, it is a melt glass, all exterior surfaces have been defined interface,

Third image attached, it is a solid one. First and second images assembled has been assemblied,

Last one image, environmental air, all inside faces defined interface to solid external faces ( 3 image)

The problem only has been seen in 1 and 2

Kind Regards,
Attached Images
File Type: jpg İsolating Gap.JPG (54.6 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Interior Gol.JPG (34.0 KB, 8 views)
File Type: jpg Neckring solid.JPG (94.0 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Air.JPG (49.5 KB, 8 views)
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 19, 2016, 18:34
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 14
Kapi is on a distinguished road
In DM, have you changed shared topology method from "Automatic" to "Imprints" ??
Its possible that thr is only 1 surface between two bodies and you have renamed them twice!
change method to Imprints and try again and it should solve problem of overlapping NS.
Kapi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2016, 02:18
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapi View Post
In DM, have you changed shared topology method from "Automatic" to "Imprints" ??
Its possible that thr is only 1 surface between two bodies and you have renamed them twice!
change method to Imprints and try again and it should solve problem of overlapping NS.
Thank you Sir,

I would like to ask you another question if you please,

if solid zone and fluid zone contact each other, ''interface'' as named selection is correct ?

The reason why I ask you, I need to define temperature in fluid zone, but all faces are defined ''interface'' thats why I couldnt specify any temperature value in fluid zone.
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2016, 02:25
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 584
Rep Power: 14
Kapi is on a distinguished road
what i do is define both interface separately
like solid side face as "Interface_solid_fluid"
Fluid side face as "Interface_fluid_solid"
this way i know which face to call

similarly you can create whatever named selection you like, you just need to remember when you call it.
Kapi is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 20, 2016, 02:38
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Onur Özcan
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Istanbul/Turkey
Posts: 461
Rep Power: 12
oozcan is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kapi View Post
what i do is define both interface separately
like solid side face as "Interface_solid_fluid"
Fluid side face as "Interface_fluid_solid"
this way i know which face to call

similarly you can create whatever named selection you like, you just need to remember when you call it.
Hi thank you,

Ok but I couldnt tell you correctly that problem,

Attached images are ''fluid'', and part in first image enter into second one image. Both are contacted in inner section. And I need to define temperature (in)both fluid zoneas boundary condition in FLUENT. But as those are ''interface'', I could not give temperature inputs.

Although, part in second image (that is fluid) contacts to solid part. Those are ''interfaces'' in similar way.

How can I define both interfaces and give temperature inputs as boundary condition in FLUENT. Is it possible or do you understand me ?

Thank you for all
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Interior Gol.JPG (34.0 KB, 2 views)
File Type: jpg İsolating Gap.JPG (54.6 KB, 2 views)
oozcan is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
y+ and u+ values with low-Re RANS turbulence models: utility + testcase florian_krause OpenFOAM 114 August 23, 2023 05:37
Near wall treatment in k-omega SST Arnoldinho OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 38 March 8, 2017 13:48
[OpenFOAM] Native ParaView Reader Bugs tj22 ParaView 270 January 4, 2016 11:39
Problem with compile the setParabolicInlet ivanyao OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 6 September 5, 2008 20:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:47.