CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[GAMBIT] Can't refine face mesh enough

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 3, 2009, 13:37
Default Can't refine face mesh enough
  #1
New Member
 
Matthew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
mbeals is on a distinguished road
I am attempting to model an aircraft probe that is a rather complex shape. I have an image below:




I have manipulated the face meshes to get worst element skewness to around 0.7, but due to the sharp tips (below), I can't improve beyond that. This is with the tips being meshed on a 0.25 spacing. I have a boundary layer attached to the faces of the entire probe, which starts at .5 and grows at 1.4 for 8 layers. When I attempt to volume mesh this (subtracted from a cube), using T-grid, it always fails, telling me to check skewness in areas of small gaps. No amount of refinement seems to get it to work. The only way I have successfully meshed it was when I used stairstep. However that ignores the boundary layer and produces a highly skewed volume mesh. Any tips or tricks on how to approach this would be greatly appreciated.

mbeals is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2009, 13:55
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,789
Rep Power: 28
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Merge the 2 faces in front of your geometry, it will delete the diagonal edge which generates the small angle (and produces high skewness).
Do the same at the adjacent side (right side on the picture) with the other diagonal edge.
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2009, 14:48
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Matthew
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
mbeals is on a distinguished road
awesome, thanks.

Quick question. Could I merge the other two flat faces with the front one too without losing the shape of the tip?
mbeals is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 3, 2009, 15:02
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,789
Rep Power: 28
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Gambit won't allow you to do that, because the edge is needed to describe the shape.
What should be the aim for this? if the diagonals are gone, you are in the case of 90 corner (ideal)
But you can try (save before)
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Import netgen mesh to OpenFOAM hsieh Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 32 September 13, 2011 05:50
TranformPoints gives skewed mesh Possible Bug andersking OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities 3 March 25, 2008 22:33
Numerical calculation interFoam never finishes unoder OpenFOAM Mesh Utilities 9 October 18, 2005 05:00
Convergence problem when refine the mesh... TB CFX 16 June 17, 2005 04:33
how to increase face mesh no.? Shankar FLUENT 4 August 9, 2002 15:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:21.