CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] negative mesh volume problem (icem-cfd/cfx)

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 30, 2009, 15:01
Default negative mesh volume problem (icem-cfd/cfx)
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
adam2008 is on a distinguished road
hi,
Got an error as below in CFX. I am using Icem-CFD to generate mesh. But in Icem-cfd, i already did smoothing and all determinant values in icem-cfd are above zero. I am wondering, how can I find this mesh problem in icem-cfd? Which mesh quality parameter should i check in icem-cfd? Because each time, cfx takes a long time to read in icem-cfd mesh due to large size, it is really waste of time when this error comes out. So if I can know this problem in icem-cfd, that would be very helpful. thanks a lot


ERROR #002100012 has occurred in subroutine cVolSec. |
| Message: |
| A negative ELEMENT volume has been detected. This is a fatal |
| error and execution will be terminated. The location of the first |
| negative volume is reported below. |
| Volume : -0.5637E-12 |
| Location : ( 0.10718E+01, 0.61251E-02, -0.61110E-01)
adam2008 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 31, 2009, 13:53
Default Check the unstructured mesh before exporting...
  #2
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about

I asked around to be sure, but we are guessing that you did the check in ICEM CFD on the Pre-mesh and not the Unstructured mesh.



We recommend that you do your mesh checks on the unstructured mesh before outputting to an unstructured solver…


For some reason, checking the mesh before this conversion is made does not always show the same errors you will find in an unstructured solver (like CFX).



I am guessing that the problem is in a refined boundary layer. You probably have a misalignment of parts (curves not aligned with surfaces to the same tolerance as your first cell height) and the mesh is trying to follow too closely. In certain situations, this can invert the boundary layer in the last element when projection changes from one entity to the other. If that is what you find, setting projection limit can really help.


PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2010, 19:42
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 8
Josh is on a distinguished road
Simon -

I did check on the unstructured mesh and found negative elements, likely because of the sharp airfoil-wall interaction in my domain as seen below.



Here are the volume check results:



As you can see, the negative volumes interact primarily at the leading and trailing edges of the rotor I am studying.

How would you recommend eliminating these negative elements? I haven't performed any smoothing in these pictures, though when I performed orthogonality smoothing (it's a hexa mesh), the negative element issue was worsened.
Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2010, 06:32
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Mark Bell
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Holywood
Posts: 12
Rep Power: 7
mbell10 is on a distinguished road
is there a chance that your mesh isnt interfacing correctly causing your negative volumes?
mbell10 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2010, 15:00
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Joshua Counsil
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 366
Rep Power: 8
Josh is on a distinguished road
I appreciate your prompt response, Mark, though I'm not sure what you mean by "interfacing correctly."

As I mentioned in the other thread you replied to, there appears to be both degenerative elements (e.g. the one shown below) and negative volume elements.



Also, there is a poor interaction between the inflated boundary on the blade surface and the structured H-grid preceding it. The second picture is zoomed-in to the stagnation point.



Josh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 16, 2010, 12:21
Default Other string...
  #6
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Not sure why, but Josh started two strings on the same question...

The other one has more of a solution...

Eliminating Negative Volume Elements
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Negative Volume in Mesh by Gridgen James FLUENT 5 February 3, 2010 08:34
Negative volume in mesh motion skarp CFX 5 July 11, 2007 23:51
Axisymmetrical mesh Rasmus Gjesing (Gjesing) OpenFOAM Native Meshers: blockMesh 10 April 2, 2007 14:00
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10
unstructured vs. structured grids Frank Muldoon Main CFD Forum 1 January 5, 1999 11:09


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 13:26.