CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Improve prism mesh at trailing edge

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By PSYMN

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 24, 2009, 02:46
Default [ICEM] Improve prism mesh at trailing edge
  #1
siw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 446
Rep Power: 14
siw will become famous soon enough
Hi,

How can I improve the structured mesh at the trailing edge of a wing? The image is what I have. The prism mesh height is based on a y+ calculation, but I have not yet split the mesh in the required number of elements.

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg aerofoil_trailing_edge.jpg (54.9 KB, 194 views)
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2009, 13:35
Default 3 options.
  #2
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
The Y+ calc should give you the first layer height, not the total height, so I guess you calculated using the ratio and number of layers to find the total height?

This method of generating one or a few layers and then subdividing is good for speed, but you give up some quality.

Try doing it with at least three or 5 layers (and then split). You will see that the software can then curve the prism layers to better handle these situations…

Another fun trick is to create a trailing edge surface that would go back half a chord or so… This surface will be a zero thickness baffle surface, so don’t forget to make it an “int wall” under the Mesh tab => Params by parts. Include this for growing prisms and your prism layer will nicely walk straight back from the trailing edge. There will be pyramids at the end of the trailing edge surface, but that should be fine with most solvers. Then go back and delete the shells for the baffle surface.

Another option would be to reduce the Max Prism angle. Currently it must be set to 180 degrees because it is wrapping around this trailing edge. If you reduce it sufficiently, it won’t wrap and will just open up (with a pyramid cap) instead…

Personally, I like the baffle idea best.
Mazze[ITA] likes this.
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2009, 02:32
Default
  #3
siw
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 446
Rep Power: 14
siw will become famous soon enough
Thanks PSYMN, I appreicate your help once again.

I think my explanation was unclear but I did use the Y+ calc for the first layer height - the CFX Mesh guide gives a handy equation. I just then worked out a total layer height with an expansion factor of 1.2 and 15 individual layers.

I don't think I fully understand your baffle surface. Are you saying that you extend a surface rearwards from the trailing edge that has zero thickness and put prism layers on both sides of this surface? And that the prism are unable to curve around from the upper and lower sides of this surface?

Cheers.
siw is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 28, 2009, 09:20
Default Right
  #4
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Right, so I take the trailing edge curve and extrude it backwards into a new surface and grow prisms on it. We are better off with the prisms on the baffle surface stair stepping down (via pyramids) along this baffle rather than trying to wrap them around the ends…

I don’t have a handy non-proprietary example to show you and I don’t have time to make one up right now, but try it an you will see what happens.
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 18, 2011, 15:17
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Prakash Paudel
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 7
Prakash.Paudel is on a distinguished road
just a quick question on PSYMN's suggestion on the baffle surface. Before tossing the mesh out to the solver, do i need to delete the baffle surface as well along with the shells on that surface ?
Prakash.Paudel is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 20, 2011, 23:56
Cool Up to you...
  #6
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
You never need to delete the "surface"... Only the mesh goes out to the solver and it may be handy to keep that surface in case you want to remesh again later.

But you may want to delete the shells. It is up to you. You could also just set those shells as an internal wall in the solver and then you could use it for post processing...

Simon
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where's the singularity/mesh flaw? audrich FLUENT 3 August 4, 2009 01:07
TGridFluent mesh with internal by prism layer and internal face for diagnostic sponiar OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 2 March 30, 2009 15:02
Star mesh import problem chris1980 OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ... 20 May 8, 2006 01:07
Gambit problems Althea FLUENT 21 February 6, 2001 08:05
Mesh for 3 dim Geometry Phil FLUENT 9 July 12, 2000 04:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:44.