CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

Large Valve Flow Analysis - Inflation Problem

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   March 4, 2010, 08:40
Default Large Valve Flow Analysis - Inflation Problem
  #1
New Member
 
Sercan Acarer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
sercan85 is on a distinguished road
THE FLOW GEOMETRY IS




MY AIM:

Creating inflation on pipe and valve walls (~D=0,3m, first layer thickness=0,0001m, about 5 layers)
Also do this by using sweep method for 2 pipe sections.

NOTE: I didn't select very complex small surfaces on valve geometry as can be seen from picture, only major surfaces are selected.




PROBLEM I FACED:

I tried to use sweep method for two pipe sections, automatic method for valve section.

*Inflation couldn't be created on pipe walls by sweeping inflation. (no problem for some surfaces of
valve section walls)

I tried lots of parameters (increased number of sections, growth rate) for inflation but it didn't work.



Then I removed sweep method.


Mesher created tetrahedron meshes for pipe geometry.

Inflation created on walls (as seen in the picture below)

but 30-40 of 1 millon mesh elements have very bad aspect ratios, skewness exceeds 0,98 for these 30-40 elements.
This causes epsilon to diverge in k-e turbulent analysis at start.









SUMMARY:
IF SWEEP IS REMOVED, I CAN GET INFLATION, BUT SOME (30-40) CELLS THEN HAVE VERY BAD SKEWNESS.

What can I do? what parameters can I change?

I try to merge some surfaces on valve geometry but it deformates geometry a bit.

My aim is to get inflation without removing sweep method and get good skewness for all cells.

Last edited by sercan85; March 5, 2010 at 04:54. Reason: improved visualisation
sercan85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 1, 2010, 04:08
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 7
izumi11 is on a distinguished road
Hi have you been able to solve the problem. I've had problems with this for the last 6 months. Have you tried changing the inflation method to post/pre?
Anyways if someone could please explain how to get rid of the highly skewed elements..
izumi11 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 1, 2010, 14:02
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Sercan Acarer
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 7
sercan85 is on a distinguished road
Yes I have solved it by changing mesh sizing parameters.

From main sizing parameters, three parameters (something like max min tet face size, etc) must be reduced in order to fit the mesh to the geometry.

But the ratio between the three size must remain the same. If the order of magnitude of the one at the top is 1x, then the others should follow like 100x and 200x.
sercan85 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flow meter Design CD adapco Group Marketing CD-adapco 3 June 21, 2011 08:33
Problem with Convergence at high flow rates Syed CD-adapco 1 April 10, 2007 15:18
supersonic flow in compressor valve? Perceptron CFX 2 January 12, 2007 01:16
oscillating valve flow Matthias Finke Main CFD Forum 2 September 10, 2003 13:59
CFD Application in hydraulics valve flow Roger Yang Main CFD Forum 11 February 11, 1999 17:53


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:47.