|April 15, 2010, 10:20||
Prisms for boundary layer mesh of turbine blade
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 11Rep Power: 8
I am attempting to create a tetra mesh for the passage of a wind turbine blade. The initial mesh I am creating seems to work fine (good quality etc). But when I attempt to grow prisms to capture the boundary layer my quality seems to plummet! The worst areas are along the leading and trailing edges of the blade. Presumably this is due to the sharp angles?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
|April 16, 2010, 12:05||
Retired from CFD Online
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Blog Entries: 1Rep Power: 38
The ICEM CFD Prism quality metric is quite harsh (behind the scenes it subdivides each prism into 3 tetras and gives you the worst quality of the three... A perfectly orthogonal and equilateral prism would divide into some pretty ugly tetras...). In other words, you shouldn't expect a 0.3... Instead, anything over 0.01 is probably good for prisms. Zoom in on some of the bad prisms and take a look... Do they look ok?
If they don't look ok, maybe post a pic...
Also, don't smooth the prisms... Smooth your tetras with the Penta-6 elements Frozen... If you are sure you want to try and smooth your prisms, make sure you set the "upto" very low (like 0.01) and just do a few iterations. Other wise it can really mesh them up...
|prisms, tetra, wind turbine blade|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|SnappyHexMesh - How to set-up to avoid skewfaces?||pcaron||OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others||31||January 15, 2016 06:53|
|Wind Turbine Blade Geometry||SeanieB||Main CFD Forum||0||November 27, 2009 11:18|
|Meshing a 3D, tapered and twisted blade with Gambit-TGrid||teskio||ANSYS Meshing & Geometry||0||July 3, 2009 10:36|
|fluent add additional zones for the mesh file||SSL||FLUENT||2||January 26, 2008 12:55|
|Is the boundary layer suitable for dynamic mesh?||Lien||FLUENT||0||December 26, 2007 02:41|