CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

Meshing doubt

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 3, 2010, 09:12
Default Meshing doubt
  #1
New Member
 
Arjit Arora
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16
arjit is on a distinguished road
Hi guys!

Can I get accurate results of CFD of a 3D wing (finite) if I dont use a boundary layer, but instead, a very fine unstructured mesh near the boundary.. growing towards the exterior?

Thanks!
arjit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2010, 09:17
Default contd..
  #2
New Member
 
Arjit Arora
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16
arjit is on a distinguished road
One of the tutorials that I found online was this:
[http://hmf.enseeiht.fr/travaux/CD010...nual/index.htm

Do you think I can get accurate results with such a setup?
arjit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2010, 11:22
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Ming
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 16
h.m lee is on a distinguished road
depends your turbulence model.
h.m lee is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 3, 2010, 18:33
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
Chris
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 169
Rep Power: 16
Chris D is on a distinguished road
If you use an unstructured mesh, you'll need more gridpoints to resolve the boundary layer than you would need if you used structured. This is because hexes can tolerate more stretching than tets. Just out of curiosity, why do you want to use unstructured instead of structured?
Chris D is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 4, 2010, 04:22
Default Re:
  #5
New Member
 
Arjit Arora
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11
Rep Power: 16
arjit is on a distinguished road
Thanks for the reply Chris!

I had initially gone in for a structured BL with a structured mesh.

However, for the geometry that I am currently meshing, structured meshing doesn't seem to be appropriate, I have to use unstructured mesh.

Is a structured BL compatible with an unstructured mesh?
If so, how?

Thanks again!
arjit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 8, 2010, 20:15
Default Tetra Prism.
  #6
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
If your geometry is complicated and you would rather go with tetras than hexas, that is fine, but you should insert inflation layers (prism layers) to capture the viscous boundary layer. You could do it with just tetras, but you would need so many that it wouldn't be practical. prisms allow you to have the higher number of elements perpendicular to the wall, and growing in a way that efficiently captures the velocity profile, but without increasing the node count isotropically...

A tetra prism mesh is considered standard these days and is a fully unstructured mesh.
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 9, 2010, 11:16
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Ming
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 16
h.m lee is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by arjit View Post
Thanks for the reply Chris!

I had initially gone in for a structured BL with a structured mesh.

However, for the geometry that I am currently meshing, structured meshing doesn't seem to be appropriate, I have to use unstructured mesh.

Is a structured BL compatible with an unstructured mesh?
If so, how?

Thanks again!
Yes, Prism is prepare specially for BL.
And maybe you mean you want to use hybrid mesh. You can use Hexa-8 in BL, that likes structured mesh. Its efficient is more than 2 times than Penta-6( Prism). And Tetra-4 in far field.
h.m lee is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
3d wing, boundary layer, structured, unstructured


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Doubt regarding 3-D meshing of a rocket nose nakul OpenFOAM Pre-Processing 0 April 3, 2010 15:54
doubt in meshing: physics jai Main CFD Forum 0 May 9, 2009 07:17
doubt on meshing joe FLUENT 2 September 12, 2005 13:17
doubt on meshing a cylinder FELIX JOE S FLUENT 13 July 27, 2005 08:06
ProAm meshing...Doubt Antony Siemens 5 July 26, 2004 05:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:12.