CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] 2d axisymmetric mesh

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 26, 2010, 12:32
Default 2d axisymmetric mesh
  #1
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
Hi to all,
anybody help me to mesh this kind of geometry with good quality in icem cfd.this mesh am going to simulate in CFX for axisymmetric problem.

thanks in advance
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1.JPG (9.9 KB, 83 views)
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 03:14
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 12
BrolY will become famous soon enough
Could you post some pictures of your issue? We can help you to solve your issues, not to create your mesh ! This is your job

You should also give us more information on what you want to do, so we could give you some advices.
BrolY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 08:28
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
i attached a image for your understanding.this is done by regular blocking method.
sorry for, am not able bring you the exact image because it is in my office PC.
I hope you understand this.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2.JPG (24.2 KB, 114 views)
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 08:43
Default
  #4
dst
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
dst is on a distinguished road
One way is to use in the sharp corner either Y-block or Swept-Block. I would try both of them and decide depending on required mesh quality.
dst is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 08:49
Default
  #5
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
hi dst,
could you explain me with some simple sketch about Y-block or Swept block in this geometry
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 11:36
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
bharath,

You should "nip the tip" out of your axi-symmetric geometry. In other words, the wedge should not go all the way to the axis of symmetry, but to a small but finite radius. Make this inner boundary condition a symmetry plane or free-slip, adiabatic wall. This will prevent poorly shaped elements from being formed.
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 12:06
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
PS. That advice is specifically relevent if you are modeling in CFX. Also, you probably want to make sure to run such models in double precision, as you will likely end up with high aspect ratio hex/prism elements.
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 27, 2010, 13:26
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
You could just use a wedge block (collapse the end of the block). Then you would have tri elements in the tip...
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2010, 12:19
Default
  #9
Senior Member
 
Bharath kumar
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 157
Rep Power: 8
bharath is on a distinguished road
whether collapse block gives good quality elements or i have to do some other things PSYMN ?
bharath is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 28, 2010, 13:53
Default Its all relative...
  #10
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
It will give triangles (wedges) in that tight 5 degree corner. They may be fine and have high aspect ratios (depending on how many triangles there are), but the quality will always be better than with quads (hexas) shoved in there.

Simon
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2010, 10:13
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
PSYMN,

I would have to disagree. We have seen many examples of poor results in thin-wedge axisymmetric models in CFX meshed all the way to the axis of symmetry, using either quad or tet meshes. In particular, we tend to see spurious high axial velocities. These problems vanish when the axis of symmetry is nipped out at an arbitrarily small radius in the way I described. Furthermore, doing this always allows you to create high quality hex meshes. Because of the resulting aspect ratios, I always advise running in double precision for these sorts of axisymmetric models.

I will check our tech support logs to see if I can find an image to post illustrating the axial velocity problem.
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 1, 2010, 10:23
Default
  #12
Senior Member
 
Michael P. Owen
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 195
Rep Power: 8
michael_owen is on a distinguished road
Can't find an image, but here is a typical support email we received illustrating this issue:

"Hi Mike

We have been continuing our evaluation of the non-flow problem with CFX.

One thing we identified is that the model representation of the XXXXX as a thin "slice" may be problematic.

The solution using the "slice" generates high velocities in the XXXXX gas at the vertex of the slice, but nowhere else.

To investigate this, I created a model that does not have the vertex. I did this by creating a model that represents half of the XXXXX (a "half model" based on a 180 degree "slice").

The solution using the half model does not include the high velocities at the center of the XXXXX gas."

I advised the "tip nipping" technique and the problem vanished.
michael_owen is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 2, 2010, 13:53
Default Michael knows what he is talking about...
  #13
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 35
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Bharath,

I am just approaching this from a meshing perspective and assuming that you had to go all the way to the axis... (I recommend a wedge instead of hexas in the tight corner because it will be higher quality).

Michael Owen seems to have more CFX solver specific knowledge about how best to deal with this situation ... His solution of simply not modeling the element right at the axis of symmetry will also produce a better mesh than trying to cram hexa corners in there...

Simon
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   November 4, 2010, 09:45
Default
  #14
dst
New Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 25
Rep Power: 6
dst is on a distinguished road
michael_owen , PSYMN,

what are the drawbacks of the swept block approach for this kind of problems?

Concerning the mentioned problem with wedge-elements in CFX I should mention: people worked with CFX (ver.10) doing some simulations of axi-symmetric bodies got problems with velocities and pressures (non physical) in that region.

In comparison to that, the ''Star-CD (ver. 3.xx)'' team had no problems with the same mesh in that region.

Maybe, problems depend on the flow properties also and would not occur under the different conditions.
dst is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Negative volume error in hybrid mesh siw ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 4 September 3, 2014 05:25
3D Hybrid Mesh Errors DarrenC ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 11 August 5, 2013 06:42
vtk mesh or Abaqus mesh to OpenFOAM bigphil Open Source Meshers: Gmsh, Netgen, CGNS, ... 19 August 16, 2011 04:14
mesh missing after import in fluent morteza08 FLUENT 0 July 23, 2010 02:22
Transform mesh in axisymmetric safa mahjoub FLUENT 8 December 17, 2007 07:24


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 21:56.