CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > Software User Forums > ANSYS > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Meshing by bottom up approach

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   January 17, 2011, 12:51
Default Meshing by bottom up approach
  #1
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 17
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
I have a heater coil geometry to mesh in ICEM , the attached image shows the geometry. i'd like to consider a bottom up approach for blocking the geometry to generate a Hex mesh. Can some one please suggest me if it is fine to proceed this way?

Another question:

I've tried to coarsen a mesh in ICEM by the Adjust mesh density option but that didn't work out what can be the reason for this ?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg heater_coil.JPG (78.8 KB, 31 views)
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 17, 2011, 13:36
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Yes, bottom up would probably be best/easiest. You could try the automatic surface blocking with a fill... (aka MultiZone, which you could also try in ANSYS Meshing (workbench)) or you could start with just a 2D block of one end and extrude it along the curve...

As for adjust mesh density not working, you have not given enough info to guess anything but user error at this point. What did you try and what was the result?
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2011, 13:09
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
---------
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 303
Rep Power: 17
saisanthoshm88 is on a distinguished road
oh sorry regarding the coarsening of mesh i didn't know about the option coarsen surface mesh elements , later when i turned it on everything went well.

Any way I found this option of coarsening the mesh to be very useful in my case
but it's for the first time that I used it so I wonder if it is a commonly used and a recommended option in ICEM

and again as I try to smoothen the resultant coarse mesh i see that the number of elements in the mesh goes on decreasing further as the smoothing progresses, what can be the reason for this ? I have the option allow node merging turned on while smoothing.
__________________
Best regards,
Santhosh.

Last edited by saisanthoshm88; January 18, 2011 at 13:46.
saisanthoshm88 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 18, 2011, 16:28
Default Coarsening...
  #4
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,663
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 47
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Yes, the mesh coarsening works pretty well because ICEM CFD is aware of your edges and other sharp features... So when it coarsens, you don't actually lose these important details. Also, the limiting factor is the quality, so you know your final mesh will be good.

Some users like using a very fine mesh to make sure all CFD details are captured and then they coarsen to get the cell count down.

Other FEA users may start with a durability model (say 150,000 elements) and then coarsen it to get the 15K NVH model in one operation and without losing the features...
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best Meshing scheme for Cylinder Nutrex Main CFD Forum 4 July 29, 2008 11:03
Meshing locks workbench window. andy2o CFX 0 February 1, 2008 05:01
What is thsuitable meshing method for bottom face? Cartonne FLUENT 0 January 29, 2007 11:33
Singularity of grid?Volume meshing vs face meshing Ken Main CFD Forum 0 September 4, 2003 11:09
Volume Meshing & Face Meshing? singularity of grid ken FLUENT 0 September 4, 2003 11:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08.