CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

Gambit Problem Size Function

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   April 11, 2011, 10:56
Default Gambit Problem Size Function
  #1
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
Hello

I´m working on a numerical analisys of a turbine blade (2D). I have already done some simulations in fluent with my gambit-made 20.000 cells grid. In Fluent I adapted this grid with the dynamic refine function, so I had a almost perfectly refined grid apart from the trailing edge, where you could see 20 edges put together forming the trailing edge instead of the semicircle as expected.

Therefor I tried to change my grid in Gambit meshing the turbine blade with an interval size of 0.001 and creating a size funcion (meshed type / 1.1 growth factor / 3 max.). Instead of showing me cells starting with the interval size of 0.001, Gambit shows me a grid in the trailing edge that doesn't fulfil this criterion. (Only in a really unimportant part of the profile this criterion is fulfilled)

It would be very nice if somebody can help me with my problem. Thank you in advance.

El Wastl
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2011, 02:43
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
if you attached a picture I cannot see anything
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2011, 04:39
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
Of course... here it is
In the image you can see the meshed trailing edge, but the grid, generated with the meshed-type size function, doesn't fulfil the given distances of the first row of cells....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg trailing edge_prob_size function_50.JPG (72.7 KB, 65 views)
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 12, 2011, 07:44
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
delete your mesh, also your size function.
Create a new size function (type fixed)
Select your edge as source, give 0.001 as start size, 1.1 as growth, and 3 as max size.
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 13, 2011, 10:16
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your help.
Now I have two size function:

sf1:
source all edges of the profil
attachment: face (flow field)

sf2:
source: trailing edge semi circle
attachment: face (flow field)

With these functions I would like to have a grid with small cells next two the edges of my profil. But why Gambit makes me a non symetric grid like you can see it in the image. Info: The edges of the profil are NURBS! Are there problems with meshing NuRBS?





But there's n other problem:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg trailing edge_sfedge_klein.JPG (55.7 KB, 45 views)
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2011, 07:23
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
do you have only one face?
If you want a full symetric mesh around your trailing edge you can enforce gambit to link surface mesh together.
But you will need to split your surface into smaller surfaces
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2011, 09:13
Default
  #7
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much, at last I can really improve my grid!!! I tried it with an extra face around my trailing edge and it works

Can you recommend me adding a certain number of faces (and their form!!) all round my profile?

The face linking function, you mentioned, is it called "LInk face meshes" in Gambit? Why does Gambit want to know sth about vertices?
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2011, 09:41
Default
  #8
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
you are free to decompose your surface as you want.(for unstructured mesh)
But it has to be symmetric.
For linking the surface mesh, you need to give one vertice for the first surface, and another one for the linked surface.
In your case you will give the same vertice.
http://my.fit.edu/itresources/manual...mg0303.htm#689
ScreenShot.jpg
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 14, 2011, 09:59
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
perfect...thank you for your helful explaination
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2011, 05:51
Default
  #10
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
Hello Max
Thank you for your tips. Already I have obtained some results with my old "bad" grid (only one face) in FLuent, but now I want to improve my grid. In my case I cannot create symetric subfaces because of the "flow channel"??!! You can see my geometry in the attachement
Thank you in advance!
Basti
Attached Images
File Type: jpg channel+profile.JPG (31.5 KB, 23 views)
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2011, 05:55
Default
  #11
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
what is your question?
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2011, 06:18
Default
  #12
New Member
 
Basti
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 6
El Wastl is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by -mAx- View Post
you are free to decompose your surface as you want.(for unstructured mesh)
But it has to be symmetric.
Attachment 7265
In my case I can't create symmetric subfaces because of the channel geometry (periodic boundaries). But nevertheless I would like to have a fine and symmetric grid all round the trailing edge! Do you have a recommendation? Thanks
El Wastl is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   April 15, 2011, 07:17
Default
  #13
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,972
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Then create a subdomain in the wake of trailing edge which will be symmetric in respect of your yellow edges-chain.
In my example, I meshed the subdomains very quick with pave, but you can more decompose those sufaces for having a nice quad mesh
I also attached a BL at the trailing edge, showing you that you can also include one.
Sans titre.jpg
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
channelFoam for a 3D pipe AlmostSurelyRob OpenFOAM 3 June 24, 2011 13:06
OpenFOAM static build on Cray XT5 asaijo OpenFOAM Installation 9 April 6, 2011 12:21
ParaView for OF-1.6-ext Chrisi1984 OpenFOAM Installation 0 December 31, 2010 07:42
unstructure mesh size control near to wall using gambit lalit kumar FLUENT 4 July 6, 2010 15:13
Problem with rhoSimpleFoam matteo_gautero OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 0 February 28, 2008 07:51


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 19:59.