CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] Similar tetra refinement

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 22, 2011, 10:37
Question Similar tetra refinement
  #1
New Member
 
Andreas P
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 5
andreasp is on a distinguished road
Hi all!

Somehow I can't believe I need to ask this because it seems trivial, but we are not getting the solution we want, so here's the question:

We have a 3D mesh consisting purely of tetra elements.
Now we want to refine this complete mesh with a similarity approach. That means, each tetra of the old mesh should be subdivided into 8 new ones, which are all similar to their "father". Thus, each edge should be split at its center into two new ones. The newly created nodes shall NOT be projected to the geometry surfaces. They should just stay at the same place where the former edge center used to be.

To me this really seems to be the simplest mesh refinement one could do. But how is it possible with ICEM???

Any help is appreciated!
Andreas
andreasp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 22, 2011, 11:21
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Andreas P
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 5
andreasp is on a distinguished road
Maybe to shed a little more light on that issue:

We have tried the "Pure mesh refinement" method from the refine/coarsen menu. See the attached pngs for an example.

For the element marked in blue, the method seems to do what we want. At least the marked triangle is split into 4 as we desire.

However, the red element is refined awkwardly. Why? Do we have to explicitly tell ICEM to use the most simple dividing algorithm? If so, how can we do it?

Again, thanks in advance for any help!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg non-refined.jpg (30.1 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg refined.jpg (32.9 KB, 34 views)
andreasp is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 24, 2011, 12:35
Default Different way to get there...
  #3
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,650
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 33
PSYMN will become famous soon enoughPSYMN will become famous soon enough
Under change mesh type, you could "add midside nodes". Turn off projection so they won't snap to surface.

Then "remove midside nodes" and use the option to convert to multiple linear elements...

It should give you exactly what you want.
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 27, 2011, 04:22
Default
  #4
New Member
 
Andreas P
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 5
andreasp is on a distinguished road
Perfect, that did the job!

Thanks!
andreasp is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Number of cells in mesh don't match with size of cellLevel colinB OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 10 May 29, 2014 11:49
snappyHexMesh won't work - zeros everywhere! sc298 OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 2 March 27, 2011 21:11
snappyHexMesh aborting Tobi OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 November 10, 2010 03:23
sMH refinement level subhkirti OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 October 13, 2010 04:10
external flow with snappyHexMesh chelvistero OpenFOAM 11 January 15, 2010 19:43


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:59.