CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

Pro/Cons of Importing an IGES vs Step file into Workbench

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By jonny_b

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 29, 2011, 13:46
Default Pro/Cons of Importing an IGES vs Step file into Workbench
  #1
Member
 
jonathan
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 9
jonny_b is on a distinguished road
Hey guys,

I'm trying to understand the advantages/disadvantages of importing 3D geometry into ANSYS workbench (in particular DesignModeler) as an IGES or STEP file. From my limited knowledge of the file formats they seem to be very similar. Does anybody have any guidance or preference as to which of these two formats they would rather use to import geometry from.

Thanks
jonny_b is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 2, 2011, 08:37
Default
  #2
Member
 
jonathan
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 47
Rep Power: 9
jonny_b is on a distinguished road
So after doing some research I figured I would reply to my own post with my perceptions as to which of these two formats may be better. I noticed a decent amount of views so maybe it can help someone in the future.

After doing some investigation and simple scenarios in DesignModeler and Ansys Mesher, it seems that the two formats don't have to much of difference. The geometry imported into DesignModeler from either an IGES file or STEP file seems to be identical. I did notice that more bodies (surface bodies and volume bodies) are created after an IGES import whereas only a single volume body is generated with a STEP file. At the very least this would imply to me that the STEP import is a bit cleaner from an assembly structure standpoint (one body to deal with versus many surface and volume bodies). In terms of performing CAD type manipulations to the geometry in DesignModeler, both formats seem to behave similarly.

I realize this might be not as informative of a post as one might hope but perhaps it can spawn some educating discussion about the topic.

One last thing to note. I've seen posts that you really would ultimately like to import geometries in other formats (ACIS at the very least). So if you have the your workbench installation configured (and the appropriate license strucutre) to allow you to import direct CAD files from Pro-E, UG, Autodesk products etc., you should do that.
PSYMN and solmaz aryafar like this.
jonny_b is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 3, 2011, 11:49
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
PSYMN's Avatar
 
Simon Pereira
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 2,662
Blog Entries: 1
Rep Power: 36
PSYMN has a spectacular aura aboutPSYMN has a spectacular aura about
Correct. IGES and Step are pretty much worst and second worst, but it is a close race for worst. It is a fundamental flaw of essentially sloppy open format geometry.

Just about anything else you can try will be better. For any commercial users doing real work, the time you save not repairing a bad model will quickly pay off the cost of the CAD or Geometry readers. For Academics, you may already have these CAD readers included in your bundle and just need to output ACIS or Parasolid or perhaps even save the actual CAD file out of your CAD system (instead of IGES).
__________________
-----------------------------------------
Please help guide development at ANSYS by filling in these surveys

Public ANSYS ICEM CFD Users Survey

This second one is more general (Gambit, TGrid and ANSYS Meshing users welcome)...

CFD Online Users Survey
PSYMN is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Create geometry (iges or step file) from fluent mesh muketa ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 10 August 5, 2015 05:38
Importing AutoCad Lt dwg file into Workbench A_Perse ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 5 March 10, 2010 15:15
Paraview command not found hardy OpenFOAM Paraview & paraFoam 7 September 18, 2008 04:59
problems with STEP file ertan FLUENT 0 August 1, 2008 17:51
Could anybody help me see this error and give help liugx212 OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 3 January 4, 2006 19:07


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13.