CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

mesh quality

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 4, 2011, 07:08
Default mesh quality
  #1
Member
 
prince
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
prince_pahariaa is on a distinguished road
what is the acceptable range of quality of mesh in gambit ?? can it be generalize for every case ??
prince_pahariaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 4, 2011, 09:13
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,992
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
it depends on your mesh (hexa, tetra, etc...)
I would say 0.9 for tetra and 0.8 for hexa.
But you can export a mesh which skewness doesn't exceed 0.97.
In every case, you may run a check mesh in your solver.
Running a model, which mesh quality is about 0.95 doesn't necessary means that you will have problem (peaks in Residuals, or exotic solution). But it is possible
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2011, 01:52
Default
  #3
Member
 
prince
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
prince_pahariaa is on a distinguished road
Thanks max..

I was getting mesh qulaity of around .25-.30 if i use tetra mesh.. and around .79 if i use hexa..

I am getting entirely different results if i only change the mesh type. with tetra mesh my mass flux is balanced and i am getting some realistic output. But with hexa mesh mass flux itself not balanced. I have changed nothing in boundary condition or anything except mesh type (from tetra to hexa mesh)..

Do u have any idea where the problem may be.. ??

Once again thanks a lot..
prince_pahariaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 5, 2011, 01:56
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,992
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
Without more information, it is quite difficult to evaluate the situation.
What are you modeling? Post picture of your mesh with tetra and hexa
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 02:53
Default
  #5
Member
 
prince
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
prince_pahariaa is on a distinguished road
Hey max

i guess i found out what problem is. I checked the grid in fluent and found unexpected wall in my geometry which is hindering the flow. Might be if i remove that wall, i will get my solution.

I really appreciate your help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg grid.JPG (34.1 KB, 18 views)
prince_pahariaa is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 02:56
Default
  #6
Super Moderator
 
-mAx-'s Avatar
 
Maxime Perelli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 2,992
Rep Power: 30
-mAx- will become famous soon enough
unwanted walls may come from not-connected surfaces.
>> Surfaces / Connect / All
__________________
In memory of my friend Hervé: CFD engineer & freerider
-mAx- is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] Generating Mesh for STL Car in Windtunnel Simulation tommymoose ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 48 April 15, 2013 04:24
[ICEM] trouble with mesh quality from ICEM in CFX Solver escher25 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 0 February 28, 2011 08:38
mesh quality control and fix tachyon_me OpenFOAM Native Meshers: snappyHexMesh and Others 0 October 6, 2009 12:48
fluent add additional zones for the mesh file SSL FLUENT 2 January 26, 2008 12:55
Icemcfd 11: Loss of mesh from surface mesh option? Joe CFX 2 March 26, 2007 18:10


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12.