CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

Problem with geometry

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 5, 2011, 23:50
Default Problem with geometry
  #1
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
sheth is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I am doing analysis of truck body. Here is the pic of truck that I am making in ICEM. I have geometry constructed in CATIA. Then I import in ICEM.

The problem is to reduce analysis time I want to create symmetry plane. SO I want to cut the body in half. Is there any way to do such operation in ICEM?

and I want to create meshing near the surface very small and the region far away coarse so How do I do such meshing?

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by sheth; February 24, 2012 at 12:14.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 02:39
Default
  #2
Member
 
Mohankumar.G
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 7
Mohankumarg12 is on a distinguished road
Create a surface bigger than your geometry at the center and use the option "surface surface interaction" in "create/Modify curve". It will create a curve at the intersection then using that curve split the surface into two using the command " Segment/Trim surface" in "Create/Modify surface. Remove the unwanted surface and close the open surfaces using the option " Simple surface" option in "Create/Modify surface" to make it water-tight.

For getting a finer mesh near the geometry and coarser mesh in the far field
Specify a minimum size which is required to capture your geometry and give a maximum size that can be possible to put it in your geometry from the "Mesh"------"Surface mesh setup".

Regards,
Mohan.G
Mohankumarg12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 03:00
Default
  #3
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
sheth is on a distinguished road
Mohan, thanks for reply.

That cleared my doubt.

I wanted to know if I just setup min and max parameters in surface mesh as you said, won't it create a 2d mesh? I need a 3d mesh.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 8, 2011, 03:26
Default
  #4
Member
 
Mohankumar.G
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 7
Mohankumarg12 is on a distinguished road
The size that you are mentioning is for the surface mesh(2D) and the 3D mesh will depend upon your surface mesh.

I think I am right but I need clarification from an expert.
Mohankumarg12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 10, 2011, 03:26
Default
  #5
Member
 
Mohankumar.G
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Pune,India
Posts: 44
Rep Power: 7
Mohankumarg12 is on a distinguished road
Simon, Can I have your comment on this thread?
Mohankumarg12 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2011, 12:50
Default
  #6
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
sheth is on a distinguished road
One more thing. Will cutting geometry in half affect results?
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 16, 2011, 06:23
Default
  #7
Senior Member
 
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 16
stuart23 will become famous soon enough
In order to get the correct mesh refinement near the surface your most interested in, you will need to assign different surface mesh sizings to the surfaces. The easiest way of doing this is to create different families for your inlet, outlet, symmetry, ground, far bounds and truck surfaces. Once these have been established you can set the required mesh sizing using Part Mesh Setup. If you wish to further refine specific surfaces, you can use Surface Mesh Setup to assign mesh sizings to specific surfaces.

You can then use mesh densities to refine surface and volume meshes in specific areas of interest without having to subdivide your domain and mesh volumes individually. For a complicated model such as yours, you may need to use any number of the above methods to create a mesh that will give you usable results.

For a steady state model, you could split the geometry along the symmetry plane. However I know people currently studying truck wakes, and I can assure you that the flow is very transient dominated. In order to accurately model the flow behavior, you should do transient simulations using both halves of the model.

Good Luck
stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 17, 2011, 09:30
Default
  #8
Member
 
sheth roh
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 56
Rep Power: 6
sheth is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuart23 View Post
In order to get the correct mesh refinement near the surface your most interested in, you will need to assign different surface mesh sizings to the surfaces. The easiest way of doing this is to create different families for your inlet, outlet, symmetry, ground, far bounds and truck surfaces. Once these have been established you can set the required mesh sizing using Part Mesh Setup. If you wish to further refine specific surfaces, you can use Surface Mesh Setup to assign mesh sizings to specific surfaces.

You can then use mesh densities to refine surface and volume meshes in specific areas of interest without having to subdivide your domain and mesh volumes individually. For a complicated model such as yours, you may need to use any number of the above methods to create a mesh that will give you usable results.

For a steady state model, you could split the geometry along the symmetry plane. However I know people currently studying truck wakes, and I can assure you that the flow is very transient dominated. In order to accurately model the flow behavior, you should do transient simulations using both halves of the model.

Good Luck
Thanks a lot for giving proper guidance.

I would like to ask, if I am finding drag co-efficient , should I do steady state analysis or should I go for transient analysis.
sheth is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] [FLUENT] 2D Geometry problem when exporting to Fluent - Unwanted walls MikeTichondrius ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 1 February 9, 2011 14:31
Transient problem with changing geometry! Fascal FLUENT 4 July 5, 2010 10:11
How can FLUENT be used to model a transient problem with changing geometry? Fascal FLUENT 0 June 30, 2010 15:21
[GAMBIT] problem in importing Pro Engineer geometry :-( arash_7444 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 3 June 14, 2010 02:06
Virtual/Real geometry. Jack Keays FLUENT 9 June 15, 2000 23:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30.