CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS Meshing & Geometry

[ICEM] meshing of a journal bearing in ICEM

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   August 23, 2011, 06:20
Question meshing of a journal bearing in ICEM
  #1
Pac
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Karlsruhe
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
Pac is on a distinguished road
Dear community,

I am trying to mesh a journal bearing which more or less consists of two pipe surfaces with different diameters (61.32mm and 61.205mm) as you see, the resulting gap is only 0.0575mm high. The geometry was developed in DM.

From the many problems I have already encountered, there are two, which I have no idea where they come from and much less how to solve them.

1. When generating a PreMesh, at some points periodic around the geometry, Icem melds the surfaces. That of course divides the gap and leads to an unusable Mesh.

2. The Mesh has a large amount of inverted volumes and smoothing only leads to more inverted volumes.

I used an O-Grid.

If you need more details, please ask me for them.

I would be very glad if somebody told where the problems result from and how to solve them.
Thank you,
Pac
Pac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 07:32
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 12
BrolY will become famous soon enough
Did you associate all the edges to the curves?

Post some pictures of your problem, it would help a lot !
BrolY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 08:03
Default
  #3
Pac
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Karlsruhe
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
Pac is on a distinguished road
Thank you for your reply!

yes, I associated all edges to the curves, I also tried it with associating the vertices to points I created along the curves, but that would not help either.

Here are two pictures, one of the geometry and one of the defective mesh, the location where the inner and the outer surface merge, occures periodicly around the cylinder, left and right of the oil groove.

bear1.jpg bear2.jpg
Pac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 08:08
Default
  #4
Senior Member
 
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 12
BrolY will become famous soon enough
Can you attach your CAO here ?
I can have a look if you want.
BrolY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 11:40
Default
  #5
Pac
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Karlsruhe
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
Pac is on a distinguished road
That would be great. But I must admit that I do not know what you mean with "CAO". Which files do you need?
Pac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 11:43
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 12
BrolY will become famous soon enough
The *.tin file ! CAO = geometry
BrolY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 24, 2011, 11:54
Default
  #7
Pac
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Karlsruhe
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
Pac is on a distinguished road
oh, ok here it is. Project1.1.zip
Pac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2011, 03:57
Default
  #8
Senior Member
 
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 12
BrolY will become famous soon enough
Ok I think the issue is the gap between the part "Shaft" and the part "Bear" is very thin. At the same time, your geoemtry is pretty big.
It looks like ICEM has troubles to handle this case. You could try to create a lot of splits and to associate each vertices to a node (and also each curves to each edges) ... It would require a lot of time but some ICEM tools could help to handle that.

Have fun
BrolY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2011, 06:14
Default
  #9
Pac
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Karlsruhe
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
Pac is on a distinguished road
Thank you very much for your help, I already suspected that the dimensions might be a problem but I hoped that there was a trivial solution to this... I will try what you recommended and create more splits and more associations.

Greetings, pac
Pac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 25, 2011, 20:59
Default
  #10
Senior Member
 
Stuart Buckingham
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Rep Power: 16
stuart23 will become famous soon enough
You could try decreasing all your tolerences. The tolerences might be low enough that ICEM just believes that you wanted one surface instead of two seperate surfaces in some areas.

Also maybe try spliting surface by curvature to generate more lines for ICEM to read off.

Stu
stuart23 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 26, 2011, 03:19
Default
  #11
Senior Member
 
AB
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: France
Posts: 323
Rep Power: 12
BrolY will become famous soon enough
Stuart, if ICEM believes there is only one surface, you would end with a 2D mesh which is not the purpose of this study I guess ...
BrolY is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 27, 2011, 06:57
Default
  #12
Pac
New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Karlsruhe
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 5
Pac is on a distinguished road
First of all, thank you two for your help.

After doing what BrolY recommended, ICEM created me an acceptable mesh. There are still some bad elements, but with a little fine tuning, I think I will get rid of them.

I think what Stuart ment is to decrease the tolerence so that ICEM understands that there are two surfaces instead of (in some regions) one. But since it worked by splitting the surfaces, I think that the tolerence was not the problem.

I now ponder if a struct mesh created with the workbench mesher by sweeping would be a better solution than the unstruct mesh created with ICEM...
Pac is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 12, 2011, 07:56
Default
  #13
New Member
 
JIM
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 5
qingyue1987 is on a distinguished road
hi,
i think you should try to us ICEM to creat much more block .then doing the association work .
qingyue1987 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
bearing, icem, mesh

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[ICEM] complex 2D meshing on ICEM kassab ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 26 April 14, 2014 21:02
simulation of a journal bearing in Comsol Pac Main CFD Forum 0 July 6, 2011 10:59
[ICEM] ICEM meshing problem xyq102296 ANSYS Meshing & Geometry 6 October 28, 2010 10:09
ICEM Meshing Jaloha CFX 0 April 1, 2008 06:24
Missing tets along line when meshing with ICEM CFD Georges P. Côté CFX 6 March 23, 2006 01:34


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21.