|
[Sponsors] | |||||
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 10
Rep Power: 4 ![]() |
I modeled an industrial cyclone of 0.99 m radius and height around 11 m. The bottom part of the tangential velocity inlet gave skewness error while meshing in GAMBIT. For that I shifted the tangential inlet duct by 1 mm towards the cyclone axis to reduce the skewness. Now I'm, somehow, able to mesh (both surface and volume) and i've got around 1,60,000 tet cells (I'm still in trial phase). Is this shifting of the tangential inlet duct by 1 mm over 0.99 m radius justified? Moreover I'm unable to generate hex cells which, so far as I know, is better for my problem than tet cells!!! Suggestions will be appreciated !
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Steam-Water Vertical Cyclone Separator | Munggang | FLUENT | 0 | February 18, 2012 00:09 |
| [DPM problem] infinite particles loop in domain (twin cyclone - double cyclone)) | ghost82 | FLUENT | 1 | November 14, 2011 07:48 |
| pulverized coal cyclone burner | Manuel Acosta | FLUENT | 9 | May 24, 2007 05:04 |
| How to mesh the worm-inlet cyclone | Fuping Qian | FLUENT | 0 | July 7, 2005 03:59 |
| Modelling Industrial cyclone behaviour | Günther Hasse | Main CFD Forum | 3 | October 12, 1999 19:34 |