CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > ANSYS

Problem of contact on Ansys Workbench 11

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   May 12, 2010, 10:19
Default Problem of contact on Ansys Workbench 11
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
Benjaminleb is on a distinguished road
Hello,

I have some difficulties with a contact between two bodies. I am creating a model of the knee articulation. The patella is supposed to slide naturally along the Femur when the leg is flexing whereas in my model the patella rotates without sliding. I put a "Frictionless contact" between the patella and the femur, but the patella seems to rotate around one point and to get fatter without sliding.. Have you got an idea?

Thank you very much.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Undeformed.jpg (15.7 KB, 25 views)
File Type: jpg Result1.jpg (12.7 KB, 19 views)
Benjaminleb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2010, 02:35
Smile
  #2
Member
 
adminCAE
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Timisoara
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 7
mechanicaldesign is on a distinguished road
Hi Benjaminleb,

In my opinion, the contact which must you used here is:

-Augment Lagrange with frictional. Coeficient of friction must be entered in the next manner: artificial (you will enter an very small coef. for example 1e-3) or real (which corresponding to real coef. of material used);

The contact region must be refined. If you want to retain an hexaedral mesh, you must choose hexaedral method for all components, and after that enter size option for every component, in a manner in which you will obtained an satisfied results.
Much more than that, if your penetrability exceed your imposed values, you can increase the stiffness factor manualy (by default must be 1, but you must increased to 5, 10, 20,etc.), to decrease the penetration betweens components (this tehnique is very useful in pretension, to obtain a much good results). This option will be increase the computational time.
In this case of study you must used enough substeps in a manner in which solution converge. In my opinion, is enough to used betweens 10 and 30 substeps. From some test you are only person which decide the optimum number of substeps to obtained a good results.

So, keep in touch about your results from your study, following the sugestion presented anerior. I waiting good news, and maybe some image or movies with some results.

Best regards.
__________________
Mess with the best die like the rest ... ANSYS is the best !!!
mechanicaldesign is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 13, 2010, 11:59
Default
  #3
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
Benjaminleb is on a distinguished road
Thank you so much for your nice reply, I keep you informed!

Best regards.
Benjaminleb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 24, 2010, 18:12
Default Better, but penetration persists...
  #4
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3
Rep Power: 7
Benjaminleb is on a distinguished road
Hi,

I followed your advices, and now the first step works well (if it is under 8 degrees) but the patella penetrates from the second step, whatever the degree I put. For instance if I put 2 steps:
- First step : 0 to 8 degrees (the patella slides)
- Second step : 8 to 10 degrees (the patella penetrates)

And if I put only one step from 0 to 10 the patella penetrates from the beginning.

Have you got an idea??

Thanks a lot!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Patella1.jpg (63.5 KB, 20 views)
File Type: jpg Patella2.jpg (64.1 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg Patella3.jpg (61.8 KB, 16 views)

Last edited by Benjaminleb; May 24, 2010 at 18:31.
Benjaminleb is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2010, 02:07
Wink
  #5
Member
 
adminCAE
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Timisoara
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 7
mechanicaldesign is on a distinguished road
Hi Benjaminleb,

If I understand corectly your problem, the part which penetrate the lower bone, must sliding on the surface of their bone. So, if want to do it works, and to convergence the solution, you must used some advance option from contact.

So, If you use contact criterium of Augment Lagrange, made the next modification on contact which cause your trouble:

-settup contact with update stiffness from contact option, and only to contact which cause trouble;
-increase the number of substepts;

After this setup, rerun the problem and observe what happends;

-if it don't work , put the option normal stiffness from automatic to manual, and here will be present the factor K which representing the stiffness contact. By default is 1, but you can decrease for example to 0.1 and rerun the problem;
-increase the number of substeps (somethimes this option can resolve your problem by default);

Don't forget to put frictional coeficient betweens surfaces which made a contact.

I wait good news and pictures (without values).

Best regards.
__________________
Mess with the best die like the rest ... ANSYS is the best !!!
mechanicaldesign is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Tags
ansys, contact, frictionless, slide, workbench

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problem with Ansys workbench 12 nolebb ANSYS 0 September 12, 2009 15:02
Ansys Workbench 10 and 11 Rui CFX 1 May 23, 2008 05:32
Problem importing GAMBIT mesh to Ansys geometry David G. CFX 0 June 19, 2005 06:01
problem in import ANSYS mesh sheryl CFX 2 April 30, 2005 21:30
problem in reading ansys file satya bulusu CD-adapco 3 November 27, 2002 04:29


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42.