CFX VS FLUENT for sliding vane applications -- CFD Online Discussion Forums

March 1, 2011, 03:37	CFX VS FLUENT for sliding vane applications	#1
Vmax New Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Italy - UK Posts: 2 Rep Power: 0	Dear all, I'm going to simulate a fluid machinery working like a sliding vane compressor. What I need to be able to manage is: - deformable domains - moving domains - sliding interfaces - to make volumes of fluids appear and disappear during the transient simulation Someone with greater experience than mine could recommend the best choice between Fluent (UDFs?) and CFX (multiconfiguration/user fortran?) for this specific application? Thanx

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
CFX or FLuent?	michelle	CFX	7	June 10, 2014 07:38
Mesh and Solve Times for CFX, Fluent, CD-adapco	Jade M	Main CFD Forum	4	August 28, 2012 02:54
High Resolution (CFX) vs 2nd Order Upwind (Fluent)	gravis	ANSYS	3	March 24, 2011 02:43
Fluent Vs CFX, density and pressure	Omer	CFX	9	June 28, 2007 04:13
CFX, CFDRC, Fluent, StarCD, Phonetics	Jen	Main CFD Forum	8	April 8, 2003 10:46

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:20.