CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums

Best Mesh Generation Software

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Rate this Entry

Best Mesh Generation Software

Posted December 1, 2012 at 06:59 by Far

Rule of thumb:

1. Use the mesh generator which is being used by your friends who are available to help you out.

2.Best sotware in market is ICEM (Hexa), but it is difficult to learn and takes alot time in mastering. Its tetra + prism version is very efficient and easy to use.

3. Ansys meshing is new technology and very easy to use.

4. Gambit is very easy to learn and its tetra with boundary layer (in 3d implementing boundary layer often produces error) is very good. Its size functions are awesome and some of them are also implemented in ICEM CFD. So if this product is available in your lab then it is best idea to start with gambit.

5. Gridgen is very good mesher and has technology of hexa, tetra and T-Rex (equalivalent for prisms). It produces very highly quality meshing. It has the capability to produce the hybrid meshes and which is its plus point as compared to ICEM. ICEM can produce the hybrid meshes, but it is cumbersome.

6. T-grid is also very good unstructured mesher, but it requires surface mesh. It is mostly used in automotive industry. Tgrid has advantage of producing very large mesh (more than 40 million) in very short time and use very less computational resources. A desktop with 8 gb RAM and corei7 would be enough for this task.

7. You can use combination of different meshers. For example recently one of my freind used the Gambit and ICEM. They used Gambit for geometry cleaning (also reproduces some dirty parts) and tetra volume mesh. This mesh was saved in .msh format and imported into ICEM. Where with build topoogy underlying goemtry was reproduced and then prism mesh was extruded from the tetra mesh near to wall surface.

8. Some times people also use the ANSA for surface mesh and then either Tgrid or ICEM for volume mesh. Mostly for automotive meshing. ICEM is popular in aerospace, external analysis of automotive, turbo-machinery and any other complex geometry.

If you ask for my preference I would say:

1. For learning purpose start with Gambit or gridgen.

2. For hybrid mesh use Gridgen.

3. For high quality hexa meshes use ICEM CFD

4. For turbomachinery use turbogrid. But it is limited to predefined geometries.

5. Tgrid for very large unstructured meshes and very complex geometries.

For exact advise please tell us the following info:

a) Problem type and geometry. Please past some pics

b) which software(s) is (are) available to you.
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 1349 Comments 7 Edit Tags Email Blog Entry
« Prev     Main     Next »
Total Comments 7

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    Hello Far,

    I am using ICEM, but have recently heard about about Gmsh.

    "Gmsh is a 3D finite element grid generator with a build-in CAD engine and post-processor."


    Easy to use according to the people who have used it. I just heard it today so thought it might be useful information for others here. Although i haven't used it.

    One can get the software for free from website below:
    http://geuz.org/gmsh/

    Regards.
    permalink
    Posted January 14, 2013 at 10:15 by Smaras Smaras is offline
    Updated January 14, 2013 at 10:15 by Smaras (forgot to add one line)
  2. Old Comment
    what about polyhedral mesh?
    permalink
    Posted July 26, 2014 at 02:09 by aroma aroma is offline
  3. Old Comment
    Far's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by aroma View Comment
    what about polyhedral mesh?
    You can convert mesh to poly in Fluent ...
    permalink
    Posted July 26, 2014 at 06:11 by Far Far is offline
  4. Old Comment
    What about star-CCM+? I found that very easy and efficient in polyhedral mesh generation. Have you made any comparison between Fluent poly and Star-CCM+ polyhedral mesh?

    regards
    permalink
    Posted July 27, 2014 at 07:06 by aroma aroma is offline
  5. Old Comment
    Far's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by aroma View Comment
    What about star-CCM+? I found that very easy and efficient in polyhedral mesh generation. Have you made any comparison between Fluent poly and Star-CCM+ polyhedral mesh?

    regards
    I have no experience with star-ccm+...

    Never did the comparison between fluent and star ccm+. But i believe there is no need for polyhedra meshes...
    permalink
    Posted July 27, 2014 at 07:29 by Far Far is offline
  6. Old Comment
    I had a study about that. using polyhedral mesh result in faster solution in some cases
    permalink
    Posted July 27, 2014 at 14:54 by aroma aroma is offline
  7. Old Comment
    Far's Avatar
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by aroma View Comment
    I had a study about that. using polyhedral mesh result in faster solution in some cases
    A reply from Simon (post # 2 particularly)

    http://www.cfd-online.com/Forums/ans...l-meshing.html

    It is mentioned there that CFX is already a polyhedra solver by default, but it does not accept poly meshes...

    Fluent can easily handle poly meshes etc...

    There is some advantage of poly meshes in case of high swirl, which CFX automatically gives you, as it is already solving equations on poly meshes...

    But you can not avoid bad quality in narrow gap with the help of poly...

    Poly is inverse of tetra...

    There is no standard method to measure the quality of poly mesh...

    So in short "poly will not be the magic solution to CFD problems"
    permalink
    Posted July 27, 2014 at 15:50 by Far Far is offline
 

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26.