CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums

Uncategorized

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

OpenFoam, SALOME, all free tools for engineers
Uncategorized Entries with no category
Old

Airfoil NACA 23012 results, transonic flow

Posted May 28, 2013 at 05:38 by skeptik (CFD notes)

What i've got about my airfoil (exp and Fluent data were extracted from article, but it's in russian. originally exp data from TZAGI report)
Click image for larger version

Name:	M06_rhocentral.jpg
Views:	474
Size:	87.8 KB
ID:	143

So there present oscillations, they were caused by second order schemes. I'll simulate it on upwind later.

The differences in p fields are showed here:

upwind
Name:  firstOrder.jpg
Views: 1791
Size:  15.1 KB
linear corrected 1
Name:  secondOrd.jpg
Views: 1607
Size:  16.8 KB
Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 1924 Comments 0 skeptik is offline Edit Tags
Old

2D-empty vs pseudo 2D upd. results

Posted April 18, 2013 at 02:53 by skeptik (CFD notes)
Updated April 18, 2013 at 03:15 by skeptik

Pseudo 2D results is here on the graph
Name:  kOmega_PisoHexPseudo2D.jpg
Views: 829
Size:  39.2 KB

Cx is predicted very well, so let's make a comparation with 2D results

Name:  table_en.jpg
Views: 784
Size:  31.4 KB

The difference is really big on supercritical angles, the PISO's results on 2D tetra meshes were also bad and quite similar to the 2D hexa's results.

So, it's better to use PISO with symmPlane or slip BC on domain's sides

#OpenFoam #2Dairfoil
Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 573 Comments 0 skeptik is offline Edit Tags
Old

2D-empty vs pseudo 2D - symmPlane

Posted April 15, 2013 at 04:35 by skeptik (CFD notes)

It seems there is big difference in case with 1-cell thick domain where we set empty BC compare to case with 5-cells or 3 - cells thick where we set symmPlane

for SST and NACA23012 we have (17 and 15 grad angle of attack)

Click image for larger version

Name:	table.png
Views:	214
Size:	14.5 KB
ID:	137

So when we use PISO, it would be better to use 5 or 3 -cells thick domain.
Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 629 Comments 0 skeptik is offline Edit Tags
Old

blockMesh,snappyMesh and experimental results for 2D airfoil

Posted April 1, 2013 at 04:17 by skeptik (CFD notes)

A certain Mahdi wrote me via e-mail, that my tetra-mesh and hybrid mesh was not good for simulations.

So here i show results which were obtained with C-mesh generated by blockMesh utility OF, and snappyHexMesh.

blockMesh domain

Name:  hexaMesh1.jpg
Views: 4116
Size:  76.8 KB

mesh near wall

Name:  hexaMesh2.jpg
Views: 3339
Size:  88.2 KB

snappyHexMesh domain

Name:  snappy1.jpg
Views: 2733
Size:  86.3 KB

boundary layer discretization

Name:  snappy3.jpg
Views: 3810
Size:  85.5 KB
...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hexasSimple.jpg (44.1 KB, 2023 views)
Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 4300 Comments 11 skeptik is offline Edit Tags
Old

about polyDualMesh "Try something smaller than 90"

Posted March 28, 2013 at 02:06 by skeptik (CFD notes)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lillberg View Post
Try something smaller than 90 deg feature angle since it represents the maximum angle between two neighboring surface normals on a surface without corners. That is, the mesh will consider your surface shape a corner if the angel is larger than this value. I typically use something between 45 and 80 depending on the tet mesh resolution on highly curved surfaces. This might be the root of your problem. Looking at my picture the curved surface in the middle would (wrongly) be treated as a corner if
...
Member
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 767 Comments 0 skeptik is offline Edit Tags

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 20:45.