CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

A silly question about turbulent flow

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   September 2, 2013, 13:03
Default A silly question about turbulent flow
  #1
Senior Member
 
Ke Wu
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
itsme_kit is on a distinguished road
I wonder why we sometimes can apply steady state in the modelling of turbulent flow

Many thanks
itsme_kit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2013, 09:42
Default
  #2
Senior Member
 
Pauli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 181
Rep Power: 8
Pauli is on a distinguished road
Transient simulations cost more & steady state provides an adequate quality result.
Pauli is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   September 4, 2013, 11:54
Default
  #3
Senior Member
 
Ke Wu
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 5
itsme_kit is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pauli View Post
Transient simulations cost more & steady state provides an adequate quality result.
Though the time expense in steady state is massively reduced, in what conditions we still need to use unsteady state
itsme_kit is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 14, 2013, 10:31
Default Time dependent or not?
  #4
Member
 
David Harland
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 4
DaveyBaby is on a distinguished road
I will try to answer this generally!

Needing to do unsteady simulations or not depends on what information you need. I guess it's best to ask yourself "do I need to know what happens instantaneously, resolved to a very short time scale or not?" That will depend on the physical effects that are of interest to you.

ONE SUCH EXAMPLE
You would think, for example, that something seemingly as simple as pipe flow in a T-junction was well understood, and that a steady-state solution was all that was necessary. That turned out to not be true!
Pipe joins in industrial plants that contained hot fluid were becoming damaged and failing way quicker than expected, but nobody knew why, as they were engineered to deal with much more than the forces and temperatures experienced. These were well known from experimentally verified CFD.
It turned out to be something called "thermal fatigue". Pulsations in temperature due to turbulent fluctuations of hot and cold fluid were causing the pipe material to break down. You could call this "thermal vibration".

Time dependent CFD can predict not only the mean temperature, but the waveform of these thermal vibrations, as it predicts when these eddies of hot-cold fluid will arrive. So in this case, time dependent CFD was very useful.
DaveyBaby is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2013, 03:16
Default
  #5
New Member
 
AHMAD
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 3
afikr is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsme_kit View Post
I wonder why we sometimes can apply steady state in the modelling of turbulent flow

Many thanks
If you take a course on turbulence, there is chapter covering RANS (Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes) equation. In this equation, velocity is composed of mean and fluctuating velocity.

After some substitutions, a term call reynold's stress will emerge. You can find this in most turbulence text books.

The RANS equation is not a closed equation since the reynold's stress term cannot be solve.

In order to solve the reynold's stress term turbulence modelling is required. the turbulence models are k-epsilon,k-omega and etc.

So, if you study the RANS equation, the reynolds term remains even if the time-dependent term is canceled out due to steady state. The reynold's term is associated with the turbulence phenomena.

that is why, we need to consider turbulence even for a steady state problem.

Please correct me if i'm wrong. I new to CFD too.
afikr is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   October 30, 2013, 08:38
Default
  #6
Member
 
David Harland
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 4
DaveyBaby is on a distinguished road
As afikr has pointed out, turbulence is time-dependent in nature and the additional Reynolds stress terms are due to fluctuations around the mean velocities. The word "regime" is used to separate laminar from turbulent as they are so different in nature!

Laminar flow will reach a steady state where the flow-field at all points within the domain will remain unchanged with respect to time.

A steady-state with a turbulent flow is one where the mean properties are constant at every point within the domain. However, unlike the laminar case, the instantaneous properties are fluctuating rapidly!

Passing from laminar to turbulent has a large effect on these mean properties, so predictions can not be made based on assumptions applicable to laminar flow. A steady-state turbulent simulation will calculate the mean properties accurately, and not give you the time-dependent detail around it.

Hope this helps.
DaveyBaby is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nu values come up too high for cylindrical pipe turbulent flow Onur10 FLUENT 4 May 28, 2015 16:58
Problem with divergence TDK FLUENT 10 September 8, 2012 01:11
Difference between recirculation zone and turbulent flow region ashtonJ Main CFD Forum 0 September 16, 2011 03:46
Reynolds and Turbulent Flow Frederic Dubinski Main CFD Forum 2 October 20, 2004 13:57
fluid flow fundas ram Main CFD Forum 5 June 17, 2000 21:31


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:16.