
[Sponsors] 
September 2, 2013, 13:03 
A silly question about turbulent flow

#1 
Senior Member
Ke Wu
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 6 
I wonder why we sometimes can apply steady state in the modelling of turbulent flow
Many thanks 

September 4, 2013, 09:42 

#2 
Senior Member
Pauli
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 183
Rep Power: 9 
Transient simulations cost more & steady state provides an adequate quality result.


September 4, 2013, 11:54 

#3 
Senior Member
Ke Wu
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 179
Rep Power: 6 

October 14, 2013, 10:31 
Time dependent or not?

#4 
Member
DaveyBaby
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 5 
I will try to answer this generally!
Needing to do unsteady simulations or not depends on what information you need. I guess it's best to ask yourself "do I need to know what happens instantaneously, resolved to a very short time scale or not?" That will depend on the physical effects that are of interest to you. ONE SUCH EXAMPLE You would think, for example, that something seemingly as simple as pipe flow in a Tjunction was well understood, and that a steadystate solution was all that was necessary. That turned out to not be true! Pipe joins in industrial plants that contained hot fluid were becoming damaged and failing way quicker than expected, but nobody knew why, as they were engineered to deal with much more than the forces and temperatures experienced. These were well known from experimentally verified CFD. It turned out to be something called "thermal fatigue". Pulsations in temperature due to turbulent fluctuations of hot and cold fluid were causing the pipe material to break down. You could call this "thermal vibration". Time dependent CFD can predict not only the mean temperature, but the waveform of these thermal vibrations, as it predicts when these eddies of hotcold fluid will arrive. So in this case, time dependent CFD was very useful. 

October 30, 2013, 03:16 

#5  
New Member
AHMAD
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 4 
Quote:
After some substitutions, a term call reynold's stress will emerge. You can find this in most turbulence text books. The RANS equation is not a closed equation since the reynold's stress term cannot be solve. In order to solve the reynold's stress term turbulence modelling is required. the turbulence models are kepsilon,komega and etc. So, if you study the RANS equation, the reynolds term remains even if the timedependent term is canceled out due to steady state. The reynold's term is associated with the turbulence phenomena. that is why, we need to consider turbulence even for a steady state problem. Please correct me if i'm wrong. I new to CFD too. 

October 30, 2013, 08:38 

#6 
Member
DaveyBaby
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 46
Rep Power: 5 
As afikr has pointed out, turbulence is timedependent in nature and the additional Reynolds stress terms are due to fluctuations around the mean velocities. The word "regime" is used to separate laminar from turbulent as they are so different in nature!
Laminar flow will reach a steady state where the flowfield at all points within the domain will remain unchanged with respect to time. A steadystate with a turbulent flow is one where the mean properties are constant at every point within the domain. However, unlike the laminar case, the instantaneous properties are fluctuating rapidly! Passing from laminar to turbulent has a large effect on these mean properties, so predictions can not be made based on assumptions applicable to laminar flow. A steadystate turbulent simulation will calculate the mean properties accurately, and not give you the timedependent detail around it. Hope this helps. 

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Nu values come up too high for cylindrical pipe turbulent flow  Onur10  FLUENT  7  February 21, 2016 13:59 
Problem with divergence  TDK  FLUENT  10  September 8, 2012 01:11 
Difference between recirculation zone and turbulent flow region  ashtonJ  Main CFD Forum  0  September 16, 2011 03:46 
Reynolds and Turbulent Flow  Frederic Dubinski  Main CFD Forum  2  October 20, 2004 13:57 
fluid flow fundas  ram  Main CFD Forum  5  June 17, 2000 21:31 