CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 14, 2001, 07:17
Default Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #1
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I call upon the forum for some well-needed advice with regards to partial boundaries in Star-CD 3.1.

I'm trying to match a semi-circular surface with a larger rectangular surface for the purpose of modeling an air handling unit. At the interface, the cells are approximately 1" cubes on either surface (except for the outer portion of the semi-circle, where the aspect ratio is slightly larger).

The problem is as follows:

I apply partial boundaries before implementing the arbitrary match command, yet I have cracks in the model at the partial boundary interfaces (indicating to me that the cells are not matched). Then, when I apply partial boundaries again in order to get these specific cells to match, my crack problem is solved, but there is no more partial boundary (i.e. there are holes at the interface). Any suggestions?

Kindly help a Star-CD rookie in need...
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 14, 2001, 12:52
Default Re: Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #2
Chinor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Why don't you try to "chisle" the imprint of the semi-circular shape on the rectangular surface? By "chisle" I mean cut some of the hexahedral elements into two prismatic elements. You can then make some integral matches one cell layer deep into the rectangular domain, to take care of the prisms. (i.e. Cpmatch the two prisms to one hex)

Once you have "chisled" the imprint, put a spline on the semi-circle and then move the points from your newly "chisled" perimeter onto the spline. Take a look at the following commands (VSPM, VSPF and VSPC).

Now you will have a common perimeter arbitrary interface, and no partial boundaries.

Your other option is to try and carry the semi- circular topology into the rectangular domain (i.e. point to point connectivity at the interface).

I would stay away from partial boundaries.

Have Fun!

Chinor
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 14, 2001, 14:01
Default Re: Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #3
Chinor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It should be "chisel".

Never was a good speller.
  Reply With Quote

Old   June 15, 2001, 13:36
Default Re: Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #4
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks, Chinor. I'll use your advice.

G
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2001, 08:25
Default Re: Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #5
HVN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I would to know how do you split a hexaedral element into two prismatic element with Star-CD in order to chisel your mesh.

Thanks.

HV
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2001, 08:28
Default Re: Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #6
Joern
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
You can use the "cdx samm 1" to create a degenerated samm cell of type 1 which has an additional diagonal edge on one face.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 10, 2001, 09:58
Default Re: Arbitrary Matching & Partial Boundaries
  #7
HVN
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you for your answer.

HV
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
matching arbitrary meshes oulebsir redouane Main CFD Forum 5 July 18, 2006 04:06
[Q] UDS flux matching by using UDF Jekin FLUENT 0 May 17, 2005 01:35
Cyclic Boundaries -> Match Option -> Arbitrary Derek CD-adapco 1 August 4, 2004 22:06
Edge matching Jens CFX 3 March 14, 2002 13:37
CYCLIC BOUNDARIES MATCHING robert CD-adapco 3 September 7, 2000 01:08


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:08.