CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

Pressure distribution

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 7, 2001, 05:01
Default Pressure distribution
  #1
Lennart Wern
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi evereybody

I am interested in studying pressure distribution on different objects. Is there anyone that know which turbulence model, differencing scheme and solution algorithm is best to use? The K-E model seemes to overpredict the pressure at the stagnation point a lot.

I am also interested in studying the frequency of the von Karman's vortex street in transient analysis. Is there anyone that know which turbulence model, differencing scheme and solution algorithm is best to use in this case?

Regards

Lennart
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2001, 06:41
Default Re: Pressure distribution
  #2
john
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
It seems that the best combination is: cubic k-e turbulence model (especially the lower Reynolds number version if you can afford the mesh density near wall) and MARS scheme for convection term discretisation. The solution algorithm should not afttect converged results. The v2f model is very good - but you have to pay for it since it's an external model from Standford.

CD should be able to send you its case of flow pass the square cylinder with von Karman vortex. It seems K-e model is good enough to do it with above 95% blending between Centeral and upwind schemes. But you have to have reasonable mesh density around the obstacle to resolve the vertex. Also set your upstream boundary (inlet?) far enough from the obstacle with proper profile of boundary condition.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 11, 2001, 09:46
Default Re: Pressure distribution
  #3
Lennart Wern
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi John

Thank you for your answer.

I have tested different turbulence models (heigh Reynolds only) and MARS. I have compared the Cp-factor at the stagnation point. As I think you know

Cp = (P-Pref) / (RhoUU)

Theoretically it should be 1.0 at the stagnation point. My little test givs that the RNG turbulence model gives the best result. It was also much easier to get STAR to converge with RNG than "Cubic Heigh Reynolds". Wth the standard K-E model I got the highest (=worst) values.

Have you compared the pressure calculated with STAR with measurements?

  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
pressure distribution sometime1990 CFX 1 November 13, 2008 09:08
Pressure distribution along hull sam CFX 1 September 13, 2008 17:09
Pressure distribution DAK565656 CFX 4 September 21, 2005 08:20
Pressure distribution Sham FLUENT 3 August 23, 2005 01:16
Pressure distribution Achilleas Tsompanos Main CFD Forum 0 March 7, 2000 11:50


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:54.