CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

STAR-CD evaluation

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   February 26, 2002, 12:22
Default STAR-CD evaluation
  #1
Baleares
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My company is currently evaluating STAR-CD and Fluent as potential CFD packages in-house. I would like to read some feedback from actual users of these softwares on the pluses and downfalls on their features.

To give you a few keywords to help you get an idea of what types of fluid dynamic problems my company anticipates dealing with. Hydraulic fluids, air, water, particulate, two-phase flow, cavitation, hysteresis, filtration & separation (porous media), laminar/turbulence, valves, manifolds, internal flows, pressure drop, dynamic fluid-structure interaction, steady/transient, force calculation, moving mesh. For more info, Pall Aerospace can be found on the web at http://www.pall.com/applicat/aerospace/ .
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 26, 2002, 12:24
Default Re: STAR-CD evaluation
  #2
Baleares
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Also CATIA CAD import.
  Reply With Quote

Old   July 23, 2002, 21:32
Default Re: STAR-CD evaluation
  #3
Jerry Huang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I spent several months doing a side-by-side evaluation of Star-CD and Fluent. I eventually chose Star-CD, but my reasons are not entirely founded in technical issues.

A straight up comparison of solver capabilities and features will not produce a winner. Both codes are very solid and both provide similar solutions for a number of cases. Preprocessing for Fluent is done using Gambit, which is very easy to use. Preprocessing for Star-CD is done with Prostar (archaic) or with Pro-AM, an automatic mesher with some very interesting features (trimmed hexahedral cells, for one).

Both codes feature import capabilities, though, Star-CD seems to be geared more towards CAD integration (you can run Star-CD directly from Solidworks).

Star-CD has a very interesting feature in that it compiles the executable each time so that it optimizes memory utilization. This is important when dealing with limited resources.

In the end, Fluent works very well within its capabilities and is easier to get up-to-speed. Star-CD takes some time to learn, but has more flexibility and can solve a wider range of problems (IC engines, rotating frames, turbomachinery).
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
density evaluation raffap CD-adapco 1 May 23, 2007 16:13
HARPOON Evaluation Tang Main CFD Forum 12 April 27, 2006 14:18
FORCES EVALUATION maritozzo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 2 October 18, 2005 11:05
hardware- evaluation Ben CFX 5 November 15, 2004 04:27
Code Evaluation Brian Cannoo Main CFD Forum 8 July 26, 1999 02:39


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:34.