|January 30, 2003, 08:25||
Dear StarCD users,
I try to study flow around square cyninder with a commercial code (k-epsilon) ..... and i've got some problems.
This square cylinder is in atmospheric bounary layer and i found some correlations for neutal ABL :
wind speed V=u_tau/kappa*ln(z/z0) Turbulence Intensity I=1/ln(z/z0) Lenght Scale = f(z,zg,z0,zc) (Harris JWEIA 1986) Re = 4.10^4
First, I see that lot of authors use It= constant and Lenght Scale = constant on vertical profil at boundary layer. Witch modelisation is good? Correlation or constant?
Second, i see that lot of authors use power law : U=Uref(z/ref)^alpha but in the book "Boundary layer Meteorology (Stull)" log law is used to modelise wind speed profil. I know that log law is equal to power law for Re~10^5 and alpha=1/7 but witch profil is good to have got a good modelisation?
Third, Witch grid near wall???? With log law, V=0 for z=z0, i want to use a two-layer turbulence model but how can i generate mesh? Betheen z=0 and z=z0 and for z>=z0 ??? Witch k and epsilon i can take for 0<=z<=z0?
Thanks a lot for your answers ......
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|why first grid point is at log layer in ke model||student||Main CFD Forum||6||May 13, 2007 12:25|
|Smagorinsky Sub-grid Model||Craig Johansen||CFX||1||October 13, 2004 03:10|
|ABL/grid/model||Alain B.||Main CFD Forum||0||January 30, 2003 07:22|
|Grid independence with k-eps model||Mark Render||Main CFD Forum||3||February 21, 2002 10:54|
|Grid generation for F.D. model in 2d domain||Robin Sanderson||Main CFD Forum||6||September 3, 2001 09:08|