# karman vortex street

 Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 April 28, 2003, 05:00 karman vortex street #1 michael Guest   Posts: n/a hi i've some problems with the simulation of a karman vortex street behind a cylinder. i want to do the 2-d case. the results for y+ as well as the results for the courant number are ok.but the frequency, i get through a fft, is not in the range it should be. i tried it also with more cells but the results aren't better. can anybody give me a hint what i'm doing wrong or what i can change for better results?

 April 29, 2003, 05:42 Re: karman vortex street #2 Anton Lyaskin Guest   Posts: n/a Hi! I have some experince with modelling vortex streets behind cylinders and other bluff bodies with Star-CD, so some questions first: What is your Reynolds number? Flows with vortex streets have a complex physics, it concerns mainly turbulence. You can have laminar flow in the vicinity of the cylinder and in the near wake and in the fare wake there is a transition to turbulence. So fully turbulent simulation is valid only for supercritical Re, i.e. higher than 1.0e7. And "classic" Karman vortex street usually means much lower Re. How do you determine you frequency? Do you take fft from some velocity component or velocity magnitude? Usually the frequency for vortex street means vortex shedding frequency and oscillations of some velocity component can have a frequency twice higher. Besides, there are secondary vortices wich also affects the frequency of velocity oscillations in the near wake. Where do you measure the oscillations? The frequency varies with the distance from the cylinder and you should check the paper describing the experiments with wich you want to compare your results for the location of the probe. Regards, Anton

 April 30, 2003, 03:44 Re: karman vortex street #3 michael Guest   Posts: n/a hi anton thanks for your answer we did the the simulation with reynolds numbers of 200 and 140000. so we wanted to have a laminar and turbulent vortex street. we messured our oscillations on top of the cylinder surface. and we messured the oscillation of pressure! your right that there is a big influence of the distance ! we also found out that you can't do the 2-d simulations for high reynolds numbers. you have to use 3-d models. what you think? regards, michael

 April 30, 2003, 04:20 Re: karman vortex street #4 Anton Lyaskin Guest   Posts: n/a The highest Re I've tried for 2D a circular cylinder was 50000. I was doing full turbulent simulation though it's a subcritical Re. The averaged darg was ok, but I didn't check the frequency (I think, frequency is more sensible to inacuracies than drag). Your Reynolds number is very close to critical and it's difficult to get even experimental results for it because many additional factors like roughness make a large influence. In some reference books I have there are no solid curves at Drag vs Re and Frequency vs Re plots - just some gray spots. I guess transition phenomena can be critical for such Re. So, probably the answer that it is impossible to correctly model such flow with existing capabilities. As I wrote earlier, there can be secondary vortices which can impact on pressure oscillations on top of the cylinder. Later (far downstream) they can dissolve or merge with primary vortices. Did you try measuring oscillation in the wake? Regards, Anton

 April 30, 2003, 04:44 Re: karman vortex street #5 michael Guest   Posts: n/a not yet. but i will try it today. and for what reynolds numbers did you get acceptabel results? did you ever try to do this simulations with a 3-d modell? what kind of turbulence modell did you use? we did our simulation with k-e-high reynolds number and k-e-square...with an implicit time discretisation regards. michael

 April 30, 2003, 05:04 Re: karman vortex street #6 Anton Lyaskin Guest   Posts: n/a As I said the highest Re was 50000. I was doing 3D simulation for higher Re but not for the circular cylinder - there were diffent prisms with corner separation which in terms of turbulence modelling is "simpler" than separation from the cylinder surface. The agreement for frequency was quiet good (I was measuring crossflow oscillations at 0.5D behind the body). I used k-epsilon RNG, for circular cylinder - with non-equilibrium wall function. I was advised to try also low-Re model, but didn't have time for it yet.

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is OffTrackbacks are On Pingbacks are On Refbacks are On Forum Rules

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Sponi FLUENT 0 March 16, 2007 14:27 yoshi Main CFD Forum 6 September 10, 2005 22:09 gellert OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 15 June 17, 2005 12:19 Zhipeng FLUENT 5 June 24, 2002 11:00 Achilleas Tsompanos Main CFD Forum 4 April 25, 2000 07:26

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:57.