CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

Mesh size for Automotive Aerodynamics Analysis

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   October 6, 2003, 02:19
Default Mesh size for Automotive Aerodynamics Analysis
  #1
David
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

What is suitable mesh size in automotive aerodynamics analysis by a software such as star-cd and fluent (Finite Volume Method)?

What about CFX Software? (Finite Element Method)?

Thanks,
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 9, 2003, 05:08
Default Re: Mesh size for Automotive Aerodynamics Analysis
  #2
Michiel
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't have any idea about automotive applications but in general one could say that your flow should pass cell in a number of timesteps. So if you have a flow velocity of 1 m/s and your cells are about 1cm your timestep should be limited to say about 0.01 m /(1.0m/s*C) where C 2 or 3. C is often referred to as the Courant number. A second test should be the mesh independency of your solution. If you refine your mesh and do the same computation your solution should not change considarable.

If you have any other phenomena in your simulation like mass tranfer of diffusion you should also have a look at these timescales. Always use the smalest.

This does not depent on the software package although some might be smarter/faster in taking bigger timesteps.

hope this helps Michiel
  Reply With Quote

Old   October 10, 2003, 16:14
Default Re: Mesh size for Automotive Aerodynamics Analysis
  #3
Robin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi David,

Mesh size will depend on many parameters. The only way to be sure is to refine the grid until grid independance is acheived.

Please note, however, that CFX does not a Finite Element code. Rather, CFX-5 and CFX-TASCflow use a Finite Volume Method, but employ an element based discretization. This element based discretization provides significantly more integration points per control volume than cell based FVM and yields more accurate local gradients for diffusion and sub-grid source resolution. The net effect is that CFX-5 requires fewer nodes to acheive a grid independant solution.

Best regards, Robin
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Making a mesh with different regions mesh size mou_mi OpenFOAM Meshing & Mesh Conversion 7 June 17, 2008 17:26
domain size for 3d external aerodynamics edi FLUENT 2 February 23, 2006 08:48


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 23:55.