CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

negative densities

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 9, 2003, 06:54
Default negative densities
  #1
CMB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi I dont know why I am getting this 'negative densities' error everytime I try running my model. Densities in all materials are set as ideal gases, den=p/(rt(sum(mm/Mm))). I have not got a big pressure drops or big temperature changes along my model. I got inlets and outlets at atmospheric pressures. I dont understand, becuase when I do the calculations by myself this should not be happening. Has there anyone who have come across something like this? any suggestions will be appreciated. CM
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2003, 10:46
Default Re: negative densities
  #2
Frederik Arbeiter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I get this error in the following setup inlet fixed velocity outlet = outlet rho = f(T,p) high pressure drop

I can cure this problem with the following procedure 1. rho=const, run until convergence 2. rho=f(T,p) 3. diminish relaxation factors for p and rho.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2003, 10:48
Default Re: negative densities
  #3
Frederik Arbeiter
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I get this error in the following setup inlet fixed velocity outlet = outlet rho = f(T,p) high pressure drop

I can cure this problem with the following procedure 1. rho=const, run until convergence 2. rho=f(T,p) 3. diminish relaxation factors for p and rho. In my case down to 0.005 for p and 0.001 for rho -> very slow convergence

If there is a better approach I'd be very interested.

  Reply With Quote

Old   December 9, 2003, 11:30
Default Re: negative densities
  #4
CMB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thank you, that is quite useful. Indeed decreasing density's and pressure relaxation factor makes it easier to converge. But I got a question, first I have to admit that i have very little idea about the control volume method. Is'nt this decrease in the relaxation factor very high?, I mean does this still valid, as an approximation? in other words is it unrealistic to use this values. I might as well be very wrong. We have noted that convergence is easily obtained by using the AMG method to resolve the pressure equation, you can activate it by 'solu,scalar,AMG' and we have been working all this time with 0.05 pressure r.f. and 0.5 for density, but we might give it a try with lower values and see if it works. Many thanks CM
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 4, 2004, 03:41
Default Re: negative densities
  #5
azmir
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello! Without changing your physical BCs, you could try pseudo-transient or single-transient with very small time steps. I found out that this is a way to resolve my neg. density issue for compressible flow case. A big jump in grid sizes (e.g. from small grid size to very big grid size at coupled interphase) might also cause the error.
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
negative densities john CD-adapco 0 March 19, 2008 07:32
negative densities Riyaz Ahamed CD-adapco 2 August 14, 2007 01:47
Negative Densities Chris CD-adapco 4 June 25, 2007 08:39
Negative Densities shyam CD-adapco 2 May 8, 2005 06:17
negative densities. Mihir CD-adapco 4 December 9, 2002 22:04


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 18:55.