CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

POOR INSTALLATION

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   January 24, 2004, 13:18
Default POOR INSTALLATION
  #1
Nabu
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I find the installation of the STAR-CD components a bit difficult and there are often problems.

What do you think?

I hope for the next version they will test installation better before sending it to us. It is not very nice to have buggs as soon as installation.

Nabu
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2004, 14:30
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #2
Brian
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I couldn't agree more. Installation is very awkward, and seldom goes smoothly. I talking mainly about Windows machines here.

I must have done at least 100 installations and still have trouble one time out of three. Some attention to installation issues would be very welcome.

  Reply With Quote

Old   January 24, 2004, 14:39
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #3
Karl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
And all the installation related to parallel computing I would say. It is important.

Karl
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 26, 2004, 03:52
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #4
Rainer
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No problem with installation of StarCD so far. Only slight problems with XVision, but nothing difficult.

Regards

Rainer
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 30, 2004, 14:09
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #5
roustabout
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I agree I think the adapco should spend more time testing the installation.

X
  Reply With Quote

Old   January 31, 2004, 23:15
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #6
tonggang
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
When install star-cd ,please refer the readme you must run exceed before use the star-cd
  Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2004, 12:02
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #7
Karl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What are you talking about exceed ? there is no need for exceed?

Karl

  Reply With Quote

Old   February 1, 2004, 12:04
Default Re: POOR INSTALLATION
  #8
Karl
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The code is ok. But unless you are a bit computer geek, the installation is a bit "academic".

Karl
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to avoid poor Jacobian in Gridgen?? Hani Pointwise & Gridgen 1 November 8, 2008 15:35
poor postprocessing in Fluent Markus FLUENT 4 March 29, 2007 07:10
Changing AE,AW etc in Phoenics: Poor Documentation Rajiv Shekhar Phoenics 0 May 4, 2006 04:47
Max residuals are far from poor quality cells Steven CFX 2 April 6, 2006 21:58
Poor Results with RSM in Fluent boris FLUENT 0 October 31, 2005 19:01


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09.