|November 12, 2004, 02:20||
Ver3.22 trimmed cell generation
Recently I upgraded my STARCD from ver3.15 to 3.22. There are lots of good things in ver 3.22. One of the cool is that error-free sub-surface is generated.
However, I see that # of unresolved cell increases when I try to generate trimmed cell from a Template even though I am using the same geometry file in IGES format. My IGES file size is 40M byte for the geometry of a reactor (3 m in diameter) with lots of internals. The manual says I can lower the threshold in template generation until the unresolved cells does not appear. When I do that, I get more unresolved cells or similar. Anyway, there is no significant decrease in the #. Is this only for my case? Is there anybody who has the same experience as mine?
If anybody has a good strategy to reduce unresolved cell, please let me know. Thanks in advance.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|v4 trimmed cell problem||work||CD-adapco||3||December 18, 2007 18:07|
|Pro-am trimmed cell export||Sidd||CD-adapco||3||December 6, 2006 02:50|
|Trimmed cell and embedded refinement mesh conversion issues||michele||OpenFOAM Other Meshers: ICEM, Star, Ansys, Pointwise, GridPro, Ansa, ...||2||July 15, 2005 04:15|
|trimmed mesh||novice||CD-adapco||5||April 18, 2005 03:32|
|StarCCM+ polyhedra cell generation||new-user||CD-adapco||9||October 14, 2004 03:45|