CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

convergence issue with turbulence

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   December 7, 2006, 00:31
Default convergence issue with turbulence
  #1
mar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi,

I am modeling the convective cooling flow inside an electronic enclosure (conjugated heat tranfer) using STAR-CCM+. I am trying to compare an intake with an exhaust fan, using velocity inlets with either possitive or negative inlet velocity. With the intake fan the convergence is quite ok, but when using the negative inlet velocity the turbulent quantities, turb. energy and disspation rate are not converging, also the other other flow quantities are converging. Does anyone know what to do about that? I varied the under-relaxation factors and also tried it with first order.

Thanks a lot!
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 7, 2006, 16:07
Default Re: convergence issue with turbulence
  #2
Ben
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The turbulence in CCM+ can be quite tricky to converge, especially in poly mehses. Check where the high residuals are by turning on temporary storage retention (on the solvers) and creating a threshold over the values. You may find that there is only one or two poor quality cells with high residuals and the rest are ok, also check convergence of the engineering data that you are interested in using some reports.
  Reply With Quote

Old   December 18, 2006, 14:39
Default Re: convergence issue with turbulence
  #3
Josh
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am having a similar problem. On my simulation, everything converges except TDR and TKE. TKE and TDR residuals both flatten out a long ways above 1.0. Using the threshold,how high does the residual need to be to be considered too high?

  Reply With Quote

Old   June 5, 2013, 12:47
Default
  #4
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 4
SB123 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh
;172677
I am having a similar problem. On my simulation, everything converges except TDR and TKE. TKE and TDR residuals both flatten out a long ways above 1.0. Using the threshold,how high does the residual need to be to be considered too high?
I'm having similar problems with Tke and Sdr, created the threshold, don't know what value to use as a max.
they seem to dissipate to smaller value with each iteration though when it advances to the next timestep they jump back to the original(or close to it) value.
As to monitoring engineering values my value (drag) oscillates with each vortex shed as with the classic flow past a cylinder
SB123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   December 13, 2014, 16:15
Default
  #5
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 42
Rep Power: 4
SB123 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh
;172677
I am having a similar problem. On my simulation, everything converges except TDR and TKE. TKE and TDR residuals both flatten out a long ways above 1.0. Using the threshold,how high does the residual need to be to be considered too high?
i've since fixed my problem with high residuals. depending on your turbulence model - looks like K-eps? - you may need to adjust your turbulent boundary conditions for your inlet. K-eps is sometimes sensitive to inlet turbulence conditions depeding on which version you use ( i can't remember specifics on this). for this i would refer you to an article spalart wrote on the topic (tubulent boundary conditons)
you may also need to increase your inner iterations/decrease your timestep/ increase resolution for your mesh many different ways to do this. if you're using explicit unsteady, must monitor your CFL. if SS and you're still getting high resids and have looked elsewhere, try unsteady.

as for convergence, as many people have said, its not only dependant on residuals, physical values need to be monitored as well, but its also dependent on degree of accuracy you're looking for in your model. i would say generally people look for .001 convergence though depending on the problem, people can require residuals below 1e-8.
SB123 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   February 2, 2015, 03:42
Default
  #6
New Member
 
IreneLing
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 7
Rep Power: 2
irenefong92 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by SB123 View Post
i've since fixed my problem with high residuals. depending on your turbulence model - looks like K-eps? - you may need to adjust your turbulent boundary conditions for your inlet. K-eps is sometimes sensitive to inlet turbulence conditions depeding on which version you use ( i can't remember specifics on this). for this i would refer you to an article spalart wrote on the topic (tubulent boundary conditons)
you may also need to increase your inner iterations/decrease your timestep/ increase resolution for your mesh many different ways to do this. if you're using explicit unsteady, must monitor your CFL. if SS and you're still getting high resids and have looked elsewhere, try unsteady.

as for convergence, as many people have said, its not only dependant on residuals, physical values need to be monitored as well, but its also dependent on degree of accuracy you're looking for in your model. i would say generally people look for .001 convergence though depending on the problem, people can require residuals below 1e-8.
Hi. I need your advise. The residual graph just wont get lower even i have increase the inner iterations, and decrease the timesteps. My mesh is consider fine enough. I am using implicit unsteady. the inlet turbulent conditions looks okay. I dont know what i can do to improve the graph. So helpless.

Pls help. Thanks
irenefong92 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
convergence issue in LES Deb FLUENT 0 March 11, 2009 06:43
convergence issue Rohit Kumar Batra CFX 1 March 27, 2008 18:43
convergence issue carno FLUENT 0 February 13, 2008 04:13
Convergence issue Omer CFX 2 March 7, 2007 11:37
Convergence issue Jake FLUENT 3 June 30, 2005 04:12


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:27.