|
[Sponsors] |
June 2, 2008, 08:16 |
2D meshing capability in CCM+ in future?
|
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Are there any plans to this? Would be great because many things are possible to model in 2D, but first 3D meshing and than calculating 2 D makes no sense because 3D meshing takes lot of time.
Peter |
|
June 2, 2008, 20:30 |
Re: 2D meshing capability in CCM+ in future?
|
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I've been using the convert to 2D mesh tool a lot recently, and while it's not that bad if you make sure your mesh ends up only one cell thick, it can be rather annoying when you decide that you don't like the mesh. As far as I can tell to recreate the mesh you must reimport the geometry, create a 3D mesh, and convert it to 2D (basically start all over).
While being able to directly create a 2D mesh would be the best solution, I would be happy with being able to modify the 2D mesh after it has been converted from 3D. Jayson |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Moving mesh capability in CCM+ | RGB | Siemens | 6 | May 17, 2008 16:46 |
MOFOR capability | USER | Phoenics | 1 | September 2, 2004 13:35 |
CFD Capability! | Srinivas Kothy | Fidelity CFD | 3 | March 28, 2003 21:28 |
FLUENT capability ? | sangrar | Main CFD Forum | 1 | November 7, 1999 12:33 |
CFD SW with Decent Radiation Capability ? | Xuemin Yin | Main CFD Forum | 3 | September 14, 1998 07:43 |