CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
Home > Forums > CD-adapco

from wrapper to remesher.... worse???

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 17, 2008, 06:03
Default from wrapper to remesher.... worse???
Posts: n/a
hi all, i am using STAR-CCM+ and doing an analysis on some car bodywork and intake to air box geometry. i have a fantastic surface wrapper mesh, it's quite nice. when i run the remesher it is significantly worse. I have the wrapper scale factor at 50%, but i thought that the remesh worked off of the wrapper mesh, no? should i be using 100% and putting my base value as lower? i have refined the mesh in these areas.

any advice welcome!!! cheers, jess
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 17, 2008, 11:03
Default Re: from wrapper to remesher.... worse???
Posts: n/a
all good, adjusted the regional settings, then created some volumes to further refine the mesh, and bingo!
  Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tgrid wrapper surface Sam FLUENT 4 September 8, 2008 01:58
CCM+ Surface Wrapper Export Ross Kippenbrock CD-adapco 2 July 29, 2008 14:27
Parallel convergence worse than serial! Michael B FLUENT 3 December 9, 2006 22:46
Surface Wrapper Zamir Rashid CFX 0 September 18, 2006 11:04
surface wrapper carno CD-adapco 2 February 10, 2005 05:34

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:52.