|
[Sponsors] |
May 25, 2016, 06:43 |
Urgent. CFD + Acoustics
|
#1 |
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 10 |
Hi all,
I'm working on 2d turbulent jet flow. I have to obtain a flow field using RANS + k-eps. Maybe some mesh adaptation required as well. Acoustic knowledge would be an advantage (Tam and Auriaul acoustic model) Please let me know if you can help out. |
|
May 27, 2016, 08:47 |
|
#2 |
New Member
Luke
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: italy
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13 |
have you never performed a simulation before?
|
|
May 27, 2016, 12:21 |
Hi
|
#3 | |
Member
Kuldeep
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 10 |
Quote:
|
||
May 28, 2016, 06:28 |
|
#4 |
Member
Adarsh Tiwari
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi vgrzv,
I learned from your problem that you need to perform two simulations, one with RANS while another with k-epsilon model. in both the simulations, you need to do acoustic as well. I would like to mention that we are capable of solving this problem. We have a proven track record of solving the engineering problems well within time and at most affordable pricing. We are into CAD Design, CFD Analysis, CAE, FEM, Manufacturing, web-design, digital marketing and SEO business. We would like to reassure you that we are capable of solving your problems. You can see our profile at: http://workshopwale.com and also can mail us at: adarsh@workshopwale.com Thank You. Regards, Workshop Technologies |
|
May 30, 2016, 02:28 |
|
#5 |
New Member
Luke
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: italy
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13 |
please...don't say strange things...Rans simulations are the same of k-eps...
RANS means Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes and to be solved you need to solve the turbolence, and to do it, you need turbolence equations like k-eps or k-w and so on...so he doesn't need two simulations...if you have to sell something please at least be informed.. |
|
May 30, 2016, 04:57 |
|
#6 | |
Member
Adarsh Tiwari
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 9 |
Hi Luke,
I was referring to DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation). This was a human error. Sorry for the inconvenience caused, if any. Quote:
|
||
May 30, 2016, 05:27 |
|
#7 |
New Member
Luke
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: italy
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13 |
ookkay!
have a nice day! |
|
July 26, 2016, 14:57 |
|
#8 |
New Member
Matt Levins
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11 |
Hi,
Please email me at ml02534@georgiasouthen.edu with the details and I can take a look. I have experience modeling acoustic noise from wind turbine rotors. Regards |
|
July 26, 2016, 14:58 |
|
#9 |
New Member
Matt Levins
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11 |
**ml02534@georgiasouthern.edu**
|
|
August 15, 2016, 18:29 |
|
#10 |
New Member
cfd_guy
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12 |
Hi there,
Sounds like an interesting task. Just for a deeper insight, is it an ejector effect you need to study?? Does get tricky if the outlet BC is not properly modelled. You could ping me on: krishna.grive13@gmail.com if you still need a solution. Best Regards. |
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experienced CFD Engineer, Oxfordshire UK (Urgent) | Patrick Dale | FLUENT | 0 | February 7, 2008 04:52 |
Acoustics using CFD | Usman | CFX | 4 | January 22, 2008 17:04 |
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 | John C. Chien | Main CFD Forum | 36 | January 24, 2001 21:10 |
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 | Chris R. Kleijn | Main CFD Forum | 0 | August 21, 2000 04:49 |
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. | Tareq Al-shaalan | Main CFD Forum | 10 | June 12, 1999 23:27 |