CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > General Forums > CFD Freelancers

Urgent. CFD + Acoustics

Register Blogs Community New Posts Updated Threads Search

Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By aerospace84

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old   May 25, 2016, 06:43
Default Urgent. CFD + Acoustics
  #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 10
vgrzv is on a distinguished road
Hi all,

I'm working on 2d turbulent jet flow. I have to obtain a flow field using RANS + k-eps. Maybe some mesh adaptation required as well. Acoustic knowledge would be an advantage (Tam and Auriaul acoustic model)

Please let me know if you can help out.
vgrzv is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2016, 08:47
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Luke
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: italy
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13
aerospace84 is on a distinguished road
have you never performed a simulation before?
aerospace84 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 27, 2016, 12:21
Default Hi
  #3
Member
 
Kuldeep
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 33
Rep Power: 10
ksingh is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by vgrzv View Post
Hi all,

I'm working on 2d turbulent jet flow. I have to obtain a flow field using RANS + k-eps. Maybe some mesh adaptation required as well. Acoustic knowledge would be an advantage (Tam and Auriaul acoustic model)

Please let me know if you can help out.
You can mail me on ksingh@tserc.infor further discussion
ksingh is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 28, 2016, 06:28
Default
  #4
Member
 
Adarsh Tiwari
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 9
Workshop Technologies is on a distinguished road
Hi vgrzv,

I learned from your problem that you need to perform two simulations, one with RANS while another with k-epsilon model. in both the simulations, you need to do acoustic as well.

I would like to mention that we are capable of solving this problem. We have a proven track record of solving the engineering problems well within time and at most affordable pricing.

We are into CAD Design, CFD Analysis, CAE, FEM, Manufacturing, web-design, digital marketing and SEO business. We would like to reassure you that we are capable of solving your problems.

You can see our profile at: http://workshopwale.com and also can mail us at: adarsh@workshopwale.com

Thank You.
Regards,
Workshop Technologies
Quote:
Originally Posted by vgrzv View Post
Hi all,

I'm working on 2d turbulent jet flow. I have to obtain a flow field using RANS + k-eps. Maybe some mesh adaptation required as well. Acoustic knowledge would be an advantage (Tam and Auriaul acoustic model)

Please let me know if you can help out.
Workshop Technologies is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2016, 02:28
Default
  #5
New Member
 
Luke
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: italy
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13
aerospace84 is on a distinguished road
please...don't say strange things...Rans simulations are the same of k-eps...
RANS means Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes and to be solved you need to solve the turbolence, and to do it, you need turbolence equations like k-eps or k-w and so on...so he doesn't need two simulations...if you have to sell something please at least be informed..
D.B likes this.
aerospace84 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2016, 04:57
Default
  #6
Member
 
Adarsh Tiwari
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 55
Rep Power: 9
Workshop Technologies is on a distinguished road
Hi Luke,

I was referring to DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation). This was a human error.

Sorry for the inconvenience caused, if any.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerospace84 View Post
please...don't say strange things...Rans simulations are the same of k-eps...
RANS means Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes and to be solved you need to solve the turbolence, and to do it, you need turbolence equations like k-eps or k-w and so on...so he doesn't need two simulations...if you have to sell something please at least be informed..
Workshop Technologies is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   May 30, 2016, 05:27
Thumbs up
  #7
New Member
 
Luke
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: italy
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 13
aerospace84 is on a distinguished road
ookkay!
have a nice day!
aerospace84 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2016, 14:57
Default
  #8
New Member
 
Matt Levins
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11
mattlevins is on a distinguished road
Hi,

Please email me at ml02534@georgiasouthen.edu with the details and I can take a look. I have experience modeling acoustic noise from wind turbine rotors.

Regards
mattlevins is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 26, 2016, 14:58
Default
  #9
New Member
 
Matt Levins
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 11
mattlevins is on a distinguished road
**ml02534@georgiasouthern.edu**
mattlevins is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   August 15, 2016, 18:29
Default
  #10
New Member
 
cfd_guy
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 21
Rep Power: 12
krishna13j is on a distinguished road
Hi there,

Sounds like an interesting task.

Just for a deeper insight, is it an ejector effect you need to study?? Does get tricky if the outlet BC is not properly modelled.

You could ping me on: krishna.grive13@gmail.com if you still need a solution.

Best Regards.
krishna13j is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Experienced CFD Engineer, Oxfordshire UK (Urgent) Patrick Dale FLUENT 0 February 7, 2008 04:52
Acoustics using CFD Usman CFX 4 January 22, 2008 17:04
Where do we go from here? CFD in 2001 John C. Chien Main CFD Forum 36 January 24, 2001 21:10
ASME CFD Symposium, Atlanta, July 2001 Chris R. Kleijn Main CFD Forum 0 August 21, 2000 04:49
Which is better to develop in-house CFD code or to buy a available CFD package. Tareq Al-shaalan Main CFD Forum 10 June 12, 1999 23:27


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 14:37.