CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFD-Wiki

Posting information about open source codes

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   November 2, 2006, 13:28
Default Posting information about open source codes
  #1
Ynot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hi all,

I've noticed that some of the listings in the codes section just copy-paste the information written on the original websites. Should we have any copyright issues with this?

I suggest we just copy a very small description and mention where it was taken from.

For example, http://www.cfd-online.com/Wiki/Visit and this is the original website http://www.llnl.gov/visit/about.html

Of course, we're not expected to write somehting totally original about these open-source codes, but i believe we shouldn't copy everything.

What do you suggest?
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2006, 16:59
Default Re: Posting information about open source codes
  #2
Jonas Larsson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Everything people put in CFD-Wiki must be freely available under the GNU Free Documentation License. Hence, just copying something that someone else owns the copyright to is not good. The original author can of course license his own work under the GNU Free Documentation License also and thereby allow us to add it to CFD-Wiki.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2006, 18:49
Default Re: Posting information about open source codes
  #3
jasond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
This is perhaps taking things in a different direction, but it is not clear to me that we need to have lengthy pages here describing any of the codes. In additional to the Visit example you cited, the current page describing Gridgen is way too long (and apparently mainly written by Pointwise people, not that there is anything wrong with that). In my opinion, we should either

a) eliminate description pages entirely and just link on the codes page or

b) impose some meaningful limit on the description page length.

I don't have anything against a short summary of the capability of a code, but in my opinion detailed lists of features don't belong here.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 7, 2006, 21:42
Default Re: Posting information about open source codes
  #4
Ynot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I am for a brief description of these resources (100 words?).
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 8, 2006, 12:54
Default Re: Posting information about open source codes
  #5
jasond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
100 words might be too short - according to wc, the first paragraph on the Visit page is 120 words, and the first two paragraphs look like a pretty reasonable description to me. I did some trimming of the first two paragraphs, and got 178 words. So 200 or 250 might be a better limit to allow for some variation, and we should impose that on all the software descriptions.

Even so, my cut-down version does not pass the copyright test (which was your original point). From a quick investigation, it appears that the US government would have the copyright on this text. Regardless of whether or not we decide to go with a word limit, this text should come down.

Jason
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 13, 2006, 00:43
Default Re: Posting information about open source codes
  #6
Ynot
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I second that.
  Reply With Quote

Old   November 28, 2006, 23:05
Default Re: Posting information about open source codes
  #7
jasond
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I was out of town for the last 1.5 weeks, so during that time I looked through the pages and made a list of the pages I thought need to be trimmed (for length or copyright reasons). I didn't do word counts - I just looked at the pages to see which ones seemed too long. Given that one of these pages (the Gridgen one) got edited recently, I thought it would be better to make a posting on this before acting. In that case, we could probably just ask the Pointwise people to trim it ~250 words rather than just zapping it.

These are the cases that (in my opinion) need to be looked at (marginal cases):

*Gerris

*Engauge Digitizer

*CFD-FASTRAN

These are the cases that (in my opinion) need to be shortened (clear-cut cases):

*OpenFlower

*Visit

*Gifsicle

*Gridgen

Should we put an official word limit somewhere in the editing guide, or just put a semi-official guideline somewhere on the Codes page? I favor the second option, since we should also add something about copyright there to ward off reruns of the Visit situation.

Jason
  Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
An Open Source mesh generator for Open Foam Ahmed Main CFD Forum 15 September 23, 2010 18:39
Open source codes for VOF simulations Asghari Main CFD Forum 8 March 28, 2008 08:28
Source codes shuo OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 4 September 13, 2006 08:34
Open-source codes jojo Main CFD Forum 6 June 9, 2006 09:13
Grid generation - Open source codes Chris Main CFD Forum 5 May 23, 2002 08:16


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 00:02.