CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Morphology

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   June 10, 2012, 06:50
Question Morphology
  #1
New Member
 
Behzad
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 4
mech-engineer is on a distinguished road
Hi dear friends
Which of the below morphologies is appropriate for modeling of nanparticles in a two-phase Eulerian nanofluid incluiding nanoparticles (copper oxide) and base fluid (water)?
1)Continuous Fluid
2)Dispersed Fluid
3)Dispersed Solid
4)Continuous Solid
Pls help me,it's very important for me.
mech-engineer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 11, 2012, 14:45
Default
  #2
New Member
 
Victor Azevedo
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 5
Rep Power: 6
victorwfreire is on a distinguished road
I'm not very familiar with "nanotechnologies" (I don't know if writes this way). But, let me try to understand your problem. You have nano-particles in a nano-fluid, and all this mixture is imersed in water?

You could try two different modelling. You could develop one model for the nano-particles in the nano-fluid, for this you could model as a continuous-dispersed fluid-solid flow. After this, you can take the results for this model and apply to the other model (nano-fluid in water), if it's the case. you can also use the continuous-dispersed model, but now considering the dispersed fluid instead of dispersed solid.

Hope this can help.
victorwfreire is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 11, 2012, 16:02
Question
  #3
New Member
 
Behzad
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 26
Rep Power: 4
mech-engineer is on a distinguished road
No,you don't understand correctly the problem,The set of nanoparticles and base fluid is nanofluid.(nanofluid=base fluid+nanoparticle).My problem is another,namely,which morphology is appropriate for base fluid and which morphology is appropriate for nanoparticles to simulate two-phase nanofluid via Eulerian-Eulerian method?
mech-engineer is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   June 11, 2012, 20:09
Default
  #4
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,127
Rep Power: 79
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
The answer is that (most probably) none of your options are appropriate. Multiphase modelling is aimed for mixing at the micro scale. Nano scale processes have very different physics, where things like Brownian motion are important, and things like inter-phase slip are negligible.

There have been a lot of questions on the forum recently about what multi-phase model is best for nano particle modelling. It must be flavour of the month I guess.

So, before I can answer your question I need to know some details:
* Will the nanoparticles show significant slip relative to the fluid? Probably not at this scale.
* Is Brownian motion important? Probably.
* Does the nanoparticles affect the bulk fluid properties? If so, how?

In general the best approach for this type of model appears to be using an additional variable to model nanoparticle concentration, and diffusion to model Brownian motion. Material property changes can be made a function of the AV.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morphology Divergence of a boundary patch field ngj OpenFOAM Running, Solving & CFD 20 November 6, 2014 10:27
Dynamic meshing in CFX: (negative volume error) vmlxb6 CFX 22 October 18, 2010 17:45


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:25.