CFD Online Logo CFD Online URL
www.cfd-online.com
[Sponsors]
Home > Forums > CFX

Bubble Column Simulation: Different Turbulence Models different results

Register Blogs Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old   July 7, 2012, 05:00
Default Bubble Column Simulation: Different Turbulence Models different results
  #1
New Member
 
zoheb
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: india, mumbai
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
zobekenobe is on a distinguished road
I'm simulating a Bubble Column; 0.15m by 0.9m, Single Point Sparger, hole diameter 1.96e-3m. I tried the simulation with three different turbulence models; K-eps, RSM and LES.

Superficial gas velocity 20mmps.

Turbulence Nature of the Results/Error
Model

K-eps = The bubble shoots right to the top and it appears as if jet has been sent through.

RSM = Fatal error in linear solver, the Water.turbulence eddy viscosity frequency goes out of bounds.

LES = The simulation runs well and the bubble rises as expected.

Can anyone please help me understand the probable errors in the simulation and the reason for their occurrence.

Thanks
zobekenobe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   July 8, 2012, 07:38
Default
  #2
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
* There are lots of multiphase parameters you should consider, like dispersion forces and things like that. That might get the simple turbulence model runs working.
* Try the SST turbulence model. It is the best all-round turbulence model these days, it is better than k-e.
* RSM models are always very hard to get to converge. Make sure your mesh is really good quality, your time step small enough and your initial condition suitable. But even then RSM is hard to get working.
* If LES is working well then why not just stick with that one?
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2013, 06:51
Default
  #3
New Member
 
zoheb
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: india, mumbai
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
zobekenobe is on a distinguished road
Thanks ghorrocks....I know its a late reply...but I finally got the simulations to run without crashing. RSM was tough to run but reducing the time step did help. The RANS model hasnt given good profiles compared with the LES model.
zobekenobe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 2, 2013, 07:07
Default
  #4
New Member
 
zoheb
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: india, mumbai
Posts: 24
Rep Power: 8
zobekenobe is on a distinguished road
These are the profiles I have obtained for Multipoint sparger incorporating the K eps and RANS models for simulation. Bubble Size 5mm, column dimensions 0.15m by 1m.

Any ..absolutely any comments would dearly be appreciated

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg keps bubble column.JPG (59.2 KB, 19 views)
File Type: jpg RSM bubble column.JPG (56.2 KB, 19 views)
zobekenobe is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 3, 2013, 19:25
Default
  #5
Super Moderator
 
Glenn Horrocks
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,823
Rep Power: 85
ghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura aboutghorrocks has a spectacular aura about
This looks typical for RSM - RSM predicts additional vorticies and lots of little features, and k-e predicts a single big vortex with something approaching solid body rotation.
ghorrocks is offline   Reply With Quote

Old   January 28, 2013, 10:02
Default
  #6
Senior Member
 
OJ
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kindom
Posts: 475
Rep Power: 11
oj.bulmer will become famous soon enough
What was the rationale for the simulation, if I may ask? If it is just about the traces of bubble, then did you use Langrangian particle tracking, or it was for bubble size distribution etc using population balance model (MUSIG etc)? Which forces did you enable on bubbles? From the picture it looks like Drag and Lift (since the diameter is small) are a must. You may consider dispersion force as well, if you are lucky enough to have economical convergence...

EDITED>>
Adaptive timestepping really helps, since typically it is difficult to estimate the right timescales... I am quite surprised at your selection of RSM/LES though, considering the quality of mesh these models demand. Throw in the complexity of multiphase physics and its a nightmare in terms of cost and possibility of convergence..
oj.bulmer is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Water subcooled boiling Attesz CFX 7 January 5, 2013 04:32
bubble collapse simulation ndabir FLUENT 2 July 31, 2012 12:59
CFX bubble simulation with free surface model adma CFX 6 February 3, 2006 12:17
Turbulence models Reza Imani Main CFD Forum 6 November 16, 1999 11:37
Turbulence Intensity Vs CFD Simulation Apple L S Chan Main CFD Forum 3 December 15, 1998 18:28


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 16:08.